Healthy Outlook for Pharma Services - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Healthy Outlook for Pharma Services
Respondents to the 2011 PharmSource-Pharmaceutical Technology Outsourcing Survey paint a positive picture, but concerns linger under the surface. This article is part of a special issue on Outsourcing.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, pp. s8-s17

This article is part of a special issue on Outsourcing Resources


PHOTO: BURAZIN / GETTY IMAGES
Bio/pharmaceutical companies are expecting significant growth in their contract-services spending in 2011, but it may not be enough to satisfy service providers. That's the sense we get from the 2011 edition of the PharmSource–Pharmaceutical Technology Outsourcing Survey.


Figure 1 How will your contract-services spending change this year?
Among bio/pharmaceutical company respondents to the survey, 64% indicated that they expect their spending on contract services to increase in 2011 compared with 2010 (see Figure 1); that percentage is up substantially from the 2010 and 2009 surveys. In fact, 44% of respondents expect their spending to grow by 10% or more this year, versus just 36% in the previous two annual surveys. We haven't seen these levels of expected spending growth since the middle of the last decade, which represented a high watermark for the contract-services industry.


Figure 2 What will business be like for your company this year?
Increased activity by bio/pharmaceutical clients is reflected in the responses of the contract-service providers, 80% of whom indicated that they expect 2011 to be "good" or better (see Figure 2) than the previous year. However, that percentage is up only slightly from 2010 results, and there was no increase in the share of respondents expecting 2011 to be "very good" or "extremely good" compared with 2010.


Figure 3 How has 2011 been relative to your expectations?
In spite of this apparent market improvement, contract-service providers were expecting even better. Only 26% of survey respondents rated their 2011 activity as "better than expected," and 34% felt that way a year ago (see Figure 3). Furthermore, 27% of contract-service provider respondents rated 2011 as "worse than expected" compared to 22% who thought things were worse in 2010. It seems that after the blood bath of 2009, service providers had muted expectations for 2010, but the better results for 2010 inflated their expectations for 2011.


Figure 4 Best-performing customer segment
Disappointment among service providers may also reflect where the new business is coming from. Asked which customer segment has performed best, 24% of service providers said that mid-size/specialty bio/pharmaceutical companies have been their best performers, which is double the response received in the 2010 survey (see Figure 4). Both the small and global bio/pharma segments fell from the top performer ranks: in our 2008 survey, 43% of respondents named small bio/pharma companies as their best performing customer segments, but that was down to just 17% in our 2011 survey.

PharmSource's analysis has shown that research and development (R&D) spending by the mid-size bio/pharma companies has continued to grow during the past three years even as spending by small and global bio/pharma companies has dropped. This change is not surprising considering that the mid-size companies have been able to fund their R&D activities out of revenues rather than depending on outside investors.

Also, mid-size companies have not gone through the painful restructuring experienced by larger global bio/pharmaceutical companies. Nevertheless, the overall opportunity of the mid-size pharma segment is not great: there are far fewer mid-size companies than small companies, and the spending per company is a small fraction of what global bio/pharma companies spend.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here