Here's to Second Chances - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Here's to Second Chances
Multiple attempts and do-over approaches should eventually solve the problem at stake.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, Issue 1, pp. 16

It was a moving experience

"Our retain samples were stored in those grey metal, World War II-era, 6-ft tall storage cabinets," began our GMP Agent-In-Place. "Like many places, we used the cheapest storage area we could find, which was a basement area under the sterile suite. The autoclave drains traveled above some of the cabinets, and they started to leak.

"Of course, we did the obvious, most expedient thing to solve the problem. Several of us pushed the full cabinets around the room by hand so they wouldn't get leaked on. Unfortunately, one employee ended up with a hernia from this process."

Tank you

"We run one of our processes 365/24," explains our GMP Agent-In-Place. "We have a tank farm of 10 vessels we use, and we start the process anew when a vessel becomes available. A consultant who had been hired to look at data on the manufacturing floor noted that there was some slack time in vessel usage, and pointed this out to management. He was assigned to evaluate whether we could increase throughput without purchasing a new, expensive, and long lead-time vessel.

"After a couple of weeks in the manufacturing area with a stopwatch, he reported that if we scheduled the vessels carefully, we could gain a 10% throughput without additional equipment. Although we didn't quite reach that elusive 10% goal, we did increase throughput relatively painlessly, without the additional costs."

Temporary errors

"Our company's management realized that we would need a significant amount of additional packaging employees during the next two years for a special project, but expected the headcount demand to reduce after the project was done," our GMP Agent-In-Place sighed. "To keep costs and Union membership down, they hired the workers for staggered six-month terms. After six months, the worker was let go for at least six months. Each year, we had to hire and train hundreds of temps.

"As quality supervisor for product inspection, I kept a tracking chart for packaging errors. I pointed out to management that as soon as this temporary employment wave came through, the packaging chart error rate quadrupled," said our Agent.

Terms of endearment

"We use a bunch of acronyms that are near to our hearts, and I want to share them with you," our GMP Agent-In-Place noted. "They include: template blindness, which refers to when we gave our affiliates a templated standard operating procedure to use as a starting point for their internal use, but they just signed the template.

"SQUIPP. This abbreviation stands for Safety, Quality, Identity, Potency, and Purity. It is typically used in risk statements such as 'SQUIPP wasn't affected.'

"A deviation is a deviation is a deviation. This phrase means that you shouldn't have six separate systems defining deviation investigational process such as stability failures, environmental monitoring excursions, out-of-specification test results, product complaints, sterility failures, computer incident reports, and validation deviations.

"EMCAR. This acronym stands for Environmental Monitoring Corrective Action Report and contains the root cause, risk analysis, and corrective actions for an environmental-monitoring excursion.

"CAT. The acronym refers to Corrective Action Transfer, denoting a link between a completed and closed deviation investigation and a long-term corrective action that will be tracked by a separate system."

Pharmaceutical Technology's monthly "Agent-in-Place" column distills true-life cautionary tales from the files of Control, a senior compliance officer. If you have a story to share, please email it to Control at
We won't use any names, but if we do use your experience in the column, you'll receive a Pharmaceutical Technology t-shirt.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
22%
To all process for new products only
12%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here