Teaching a New Robot Old Tricks - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Teaching a New Robot Old Tricks


Equipment and Processing Report

Automation has been part of pharmaceutical processing for some time, but robotics have not yet found wide acceptance among drugmakers. Recent concerns about quality control, efficiency, and cost reduction should spur the industry to reexamine the potential advantages of robotics. Robots can be particularly helpful in sterile-manufacturing applications, which are important at a time of strong demand for cytotoxic and biopharmaceutical drugs.

Shibuya Kogyo’s (Ishikawa, Japan) CellPRO system could replace human operators in processes that carry the risk of contaminating sensitive products or harming personnel. The system includes two M-430iA/2PV robotic arms created by FANUC Robotics America (Detroit) with Shibuya’s technical support. The arms are installed in Shibuya’s isolator. The robots are designed to work in International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5 environments and do not contribute a significant amount of particulates under typical working conditions. The arms move on six axes and carry a maximum payload of 2 kg. Design features such as enclosed electric cables, triple seals, and a lack of retention areas help resist bacterial growth on the machines and reduce the potential for contamination. The robots have the International Electrotechnical Commission’s International Protection rating of 67 and are designed to withstand decontamination with vapor-phase hydrogen peroxide.

The FANUC robots can be controlled in several ways, including manually or with a standard programmable logic control. Shibuya’s Manipen controller enables personnel to operate the robots from a separate room or another facility. Jim Akers, president of Akers Kennedy and Associates and a member of Pharmaceutical Technology’s editorial advisory board, likens the Manipen to a more sophisticated version of the Nintendo Wii controller. The Manipen works through push-button and accelerometer operation and vibrates when a robot contacts a solid object, similar to the way a Wii controller functions. A user can step on a foot pedal to move the robots’ grippers into a horizontal position to pick objects up easily. The robots also can be programmed to operate automatically.

The CellPRO system incorporates two robotic arms within an isolator.
The CellPRO system incorporates two robotic arms within an isolator.

The CellPRO system’s control software has the ability to record human operators’ movements, save them as a set of instructions, and repeat them exactly. Using this feature, personnel can train the robots to perform specific tasks. After several days of practice, an operator can learn to control the robot arms well, and the arms’ trainability makes control relatively straightforward.

Manufacturers could incorporate Shibuya’s system into many pharmaceutical applications. The CellPRO system has potential to increase operator safety by compounding potent drugs, manufacturing radiopharmaceuticals, or handling cytotoxic ingredients. The robots also could help to reduce contamination risk in aseptic environments by replacing humans in cell-culture, sterility-testing, and aseptic-processing applications. The CellPRO system is appropriate for research applications, packaging, and small-scale clinical manufacturing as well, says Akers.

As it has for other industries, robotics can bring speed, repeatability, and flexibility to pharmaceutical operations. The CellPRO system is one example of the technological advances that could improve the safety, quality, and efficiency of small- and large-molecule production. As software and robots become more sophisticated, drugmakers have less reason to shy from adapting them to their processes. Robotics could become an integral part of the industry’s strategy for the 21st century.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
19%
To all process for new products only
14%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
19%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Equipment and Processing Report,
Click here