Roche Gains Top Spot in Sustainability Among Pharmaceutical Companies - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Roche Gains Top Spot in Sustainability Among Pharmaceutical Companies
An annual analysis rates the performance of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in corporate sustainability.


PTSM: Pharmaceutical Technology Sourcing and Management
Volume 6, Issue 10

Sustainability, defined to include corporate economic, environmental, and social performance, is the root of a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs and activities. Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), a boutique investment firm focused on sustainability investing, and Dow Jones Indexes, a provider of global indexes recently released the results of their annual global analysis of corporate sustainability leadership, the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (DJSI). The evaluation involved multiple market sectors, including pharmaceuticals and biotechnology.

The DJSI is based on an analysis of corporate economic, environmental, and social performance by assessing factors such as corporate governance, risk management, branding, climate-change mitigation, supply-chain standards, and labor practices. It accounts for general as well as industry-specific sustainability criteria for each of the 57 sectors defined according to the Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB). ICB is a classification system of the Dow Jones Indexes and the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE). The system is supported by the ICB Universe Database, which contains more than 60,000 companies and 65,000 securities worldwide from the FTSE and Dow Jones Indexes.

Roche (Basel, Switzerland) was name the sector leader in the pharmaceutical industry according to the 2010 results of the DJSI, which were released in September 2010. The DJSI evaluated 56 companies. Roche has been included in the DJSI (world index) since 2004 and was named the sector leader also in 2009. According to a Roche press release, Roche’s activities in the area of sustainability include decreasing its carbon footprint by reduction of energy consumption and improving energy efficiency. Other activities include involvement in local community charitable initiatives, remuneration, and benefit programs to recognize the value of its employees as well as to bring medically valuable and sustainable healthcare products and services to patients on a global basis

Also, named to the sustainability index were Abbott (Abbott Park, IL), AstraZeneca (London), CSL (Melbourne, Australia), Daiichi Sanyko (Tokyo), Eisai (Tokyo), GlaxoSmithKline (London), Johnson & Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ), Merck & Co. (Whitehouse Station, NJ), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Novo Nordisk (Denmark), sanofi-aventis (Paris), and Takeda (Osaka, Japan). Each of these companies was recognized in the DJSI on a worldwide basis and in the respective region in which the company is headquartered (i.e. United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific).

The DJSI evaluated 22 companies in the biotechnology industry and named Novozymes (Copenhagen, Denmark), a provider of enzymes and related technology. Novozymes led the biotechnology between 2000 and 2007 and again in 2009, according to a company press release. Novozymes earned an overall score of  84%, measured across 23 performance criteria, according to the company. Novozymes scored 100% for the company’s record in three out of four categories measuring environmental performance. It also scored well in stakeholder engagement and human capital development (both 100%) and customer relationship management (89%). Novozymes was recognized globally and in the European rankings.

Other biotechnology companies recognized in the DJSI were Biogen Idec (Cambridge, MA), Genzyme (Cambridge, MA), and Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA), which provides tools and services for the biotechnology industry. These companies were recognized globally and respectively in their regional markets. Crucell (Leiden, The Netherlands) was recognized in European rankings.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: PTSM: Pharmaceutical Technology Sourcing and Management,
Click here