Optimizing inhaler mouthpiece design - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Optimizing inhaler mouthpiece design


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 22, Issue 1


Nasal spray advances
Only around 10–20% of asthma medications are delivered to the lungs because of the barrier-nature of the respiratory tract and medication loss in the inhaler during the inhalation process. Thus, optimizing inhaler design would go some way to reducing waste and improving the reproducibility of drug delivery to the lungs. Through our research,1 using the mouthpiece as an example, we have developed a methodology that allows inhaler design to be optimized. I believe this approach could provide significant advantages compared with traditional inhaler design methods.

Getting the design right

We used a computational and experimental approach to design an optimized mouthpiece for a new prototype inhaler that minimizes the amount of medication lost on the mouthpiece. The analysis process uses in vitro experimental studies of aerosol performance in an initial prototype mouthpiece to validate developed computational fluid dynamic (CFD) methods for the aerosol inhaler. We then use the CFD model to quantitatively analyse the relationship between mouthpiece drug deposition with resulting aerosol transport conditions to identify critical design attributes.

During the design phase, these relationships are used to modify in silico the mouthpiece design to target the desired critical design attributes. The modified design is tested experimentally to verify agreement with the CFD model predicted deposition, and the CFD and in vitro guided design process repeats as needed to achieve the required mouthpiece performance criteria. Performance of the final optimized mouthpiece design should then be verified using in vitro experiments. By minimizing the drug deposition within the mouthpiece we can increase the amount of drug available to the patient for inhalation and increase deposition within the airways.

With our research, we were not looking to develop a generic mouthpiece design; rather we wanted to illustrate a rational design methodology that would be beneficial during any inhaler design process using this combined computation and experimental analysis and design approach.

The future?

An optimized inhaler design could reduce the velocity at which the spray is delivered from the inhaler, thereby reducing impaction deposition on the mouthpiece and the patients' throat. This will improve both drug delivery efficiency and reproducibility.

The next generation of pharmaceuticals to be delivered to and via the respiratory tract may not have the large therapeutic window that is generally seen with today's inhaled drugs. Next generation inhaler designs that improve drug deposition efficiency and reproducibility may, therefore, be required for the next generation systemic drugs delivered via the lungs.

Reference

1. M. Hindle and P.W. Longest, "A quantitative analysis and design (QAD) approach to produce an optimized aerosol spray inhaler mouthpiece," 2009 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Annual Meeting and Exposition (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 8–12 November 2009).

Professor Hindle's research was presented at the 2009 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Annual Meeting and Exposition, 8–12 November 2009, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
14%
To select process for new products only
23%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
25%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here