35th Anniversary Special: The Transformation of Regulation and Global Standards - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

35th Anniversary Special: The Transformation of Regulation and Global Standards
How FDA, USP, and ICH have redirected industry practice.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 36, Issue 7, pp. 45-49

Since the initial introduction of Pharmaceutical Technology in 1977, many regulatory and compendial initiatives have transformed the way the industry does business not only in terms of global partnerships and supply chain management, but also in the laboratory and on the manufacturing floor. PharmTech's reports and special-themed issues have offered invaluable guidance and interpretation to the industry over the years when new standards and guidances are released. Some of the events and issues discussed in this publication have had long-term impact with respect to how the industry operates today. This roundup article highlights some of the organizations and key influential events that have shaped the pages of PharmTech and the way our industry works.

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)



Tamper-resistant packaging regulations (1983). In September 1982, several deaths resulted from cyanide poisoning in Chicago, IL, and its suburban area. The investigation determined that the common denominator between the victims was taking Tylenol. Johnson & Johnson, the manufacturer of Tylenol, was ruled out as the source of contamination but on Oct. 5, 1982, the company issued a nationwide recall of an estimated 31 million bottles. This incident prompted the passing of tamper-resistant packaging regulations, which made it a felony to tamper with packaged consumer products. The industry developed standards for tamper-resistant packaging that are still used today.



Orphan Drug Act (1983). The Orphan Drug Act was passed in 1983 to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop medicines for patients with rare diseases. Companies were given 7 years of exclusivity and tax incentives for pharmaceuticals that qualified for orphan-drug status. This act has lead to the successful treatment of or medical management of diseases such as multiple myeloma and cystic fibrosis. Before this law was passed, there were approximately 38 drugs approved to treat rare diseases. From 1983 to 2010, FDA approved 353 orphan drugs and granted orphan designations to 2116 active compounds.



Generic-drug scandal (1989). The generic-drug scandal began when a generic-drug manufacturer submitted a complaint to regulators after experiencing repeated delays in approval of its ANDAs. The complainant charged that FDA was discriminating against the generic-drug firm in favor of other companies. Three FDA officials plead guilty to accepting bribes from companies and two companies plead guilty to offering bribes to FDA officials. Ultimately, 13 generic-drug manufacturers were investigated for fraudulent practices and several products were recalled. This incident resulted in an increase in requirements for ANDA submissions. Today, about 65% of the prescriptions written are for generic-drug products, but it has taken this segment of the industry about two decades to recover from the 1989 scandal.



The Barr decision (1991). The Barr decision was the direct result of FDA investigations into questionable quality control practices for the handling of out-of-specification (OOS) results. FDA took Barr Pharmaceuticals to court for the perceived practice of testing products into compliance. Judge Wolin of the US District Court for the District of New Jersey presided over the proceedings. The result of the Barr decision changed the practice of how manufacturers' investigate laboratory results that do not meet specifications, and on how the industry determines whether a product meets it quality attributes.

Heparin adulteration (2006–2008). In late 2006, a leading pharmaceutical company recalled several lots of life-saving heparin after receiving numerous reports of adverse events, namely allergic reactions. The company ceased production of the product and began investigating the cause of the incidents. Approximately one month later, FDA issued a Public Health Advisory to the medical community, warning the public and healthcare providers not to use heparin. The company recalled all lots of the product, which was ultimately linked to more than 350 serious adverse reactions and several patient deaths. Contaminated API supplied by a manufacturer in China caused the reactions. This incident impacted the industry because it expanded the definition of supply chain and made companies responsible for the quality of all the ingredients going back to their root source, which in some cases turned out to be several layers deep. New focus was given to the importance of supplier audits, and several trade organizations began focusing on developing third-party audit capabilities to assist the industry in dealing with the vast amount of suppliers sourcing material to the pharmaceutical industry. The incident, for example, spawned a new trade organization, Rx–360, an international supply chain consortium, and redefined the concept of supply chain integrity.

Biosimilars guidances (2012). In February 2012, FDA issued three draft guidance documents regarding biosimilars. The agency announced that "the draft documents are designed to help industry develop biosimilar versions of currently approved biological products, which can enhance competition and may lead to better patient access and lower cost to consumers." These documents opened the door to generic-drug products in an area where there has been little competition to innovator products.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
22%
To all process for new products only
12%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here