More Questions than Answers - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

More Questions than Answers
As the industry continues to evolve, do we know where we're headed?


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 34, Issue 4, pp. 12

Although I'm new to INTERPHEX, I'm not new to the pharmaceutical or biotechnology market. I spent a good deal of time in the late 1990s working on online communities for the industry, including for Pharmaceutical Technology readers. That said, today's industry is dramatically different from the one I left in 2001. The market has undergone major structural change. And I find that I have more questions than answers about where it's headed.

At INTERPHEX, our goal is to fully understand the market so that we can develop a strategic plan that reflects industry changes and opportunities. I'd like to gain your perspective and feedback on some key questions.

What do you call this industry? This seems like a simple enough question to answer, but I haven't come across a simple response. Several descriptions are floating around, including the terms pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and biotechnology. Is it still one industry or a series of individual markets that have naturally developed and morphed out of what was once known as the pharmaceutical industry? It's interesting to note that the INTERPHEX name has remained the same during the past 31 years, but its moving parts have significantly changed to reflect the evolving industry landscape.

What is the outlook for the next 12 months? Perhaps a more fair question would be, "Have you seen any recent signs of improvement or a turnaround?" There continues to be daily news about job elimination and consolidation. For INTERPHEX, the economic situation affects our attendance rates. But not all of the news is negative. Even within our business in the past few months, there have positive signals from exhibitors willing to invest in the marketplace created by INTERPHEX.

Where will drugs be manufactured? And what will be manufactured in United States? There seems to be a natural shift in worldwide drug manufacturing as domestic drug consumption grows in developing countries and production expands to meet that need. Every drug manufacturer in today's market must have a global perspective on manufacturing, an approach that involves multiple considerations. In the US, for example, mergers and acquisitions, facility closures, the ever-growing patent cliff, and scarce drug pipeline create confusion as to what the composition of the US market will be in the years ahead. What signs are you seeing?

Where will R&D be conducted? Recently, there has been a flurry of reports about large pharmaceutical companies scaling back their research and development (R&D) efforts. Is this a short-term or a long-term shift? Does the shift represent a business model transformation that is moving away from core competencies in processing and R&D and toward marketing? Do you foresee in-licensing and acquisitions increasing as companies attempt to outsource their riskier processes? What will the R&D mix look like five years from now?

How can INTERPHEX best serve the changing market? What industry trends does your company need to address and adjust to? What are your emerging educational needs? What types of products and equipment interest you?

INTERPHEX will continue to visit companies and attend industry events to help answer these questions, but we also appreciate your feedback. If we have a chance to meet at this year's show, Apr. 20–22 in New York City, please tell me what you think or send me an email.

We also plan to solicit ongoing feedback throughout the year using social media channels. Find us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, or join the INTERPHEX LinkedIn Group to participate in the ongoing conversation.

Bob Stewart is industry vice-president for INTERPHEX,
.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
14%
To select process for new products only
23%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
25%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here