A Green Manufacturing Route to Testosterone - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

A Green Manufacturing Route to Testosterone
A second-generation and green manufacturing process for testosterone provided economic and ecological benefits.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 33, Issue 9

Pfizer Global Manufacturing (PGM) takes a proactive approach to minimizing the environmental impact of its worldwide network of manufacturing sites and facilities. At the site level, multidisciplinary teams apply green-chemistry principles to process development to enhance process robustness. Such an approach can reduce emissions, lower the use of hazardous materials, and enable more process waste to be recycled. Pfizer's improved testosterone process is an example of such an approach.


Figure 1: Molecular structure of testosterone. (FIGURES ARE COURTESY OF THE AUTHORS)
Pfizer's Kalamazoo, Michigan, manufacturing site has a long history of producing steroids, including testosterone (see Figure 1), for Pfizer's Established Products Business Unit and by Pfizer CentreSource for third-party sale. Used primarily in male-hormone replacement therapy, testosterone is the registered starting material for testosterone cypionate, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in Pfizer's DePo testosterone product.

Pfizer improved its testosterone process by developing a green bioprocess route that reduced solvent use, produced less waste, and eliminated hazardous material use. The goal of the project was to develop an improved process for the testosterone synthesis that applied Pfizer's Right First Time philosophy (i.e., a scientific approach to continuous improvement to reduce the variation in processes and optimize them) as well as incorporate the principles of quality by design (QbD), green chemistry, lean manufacturing, and similar principles to reduce waste, minimize environmental impact, optimize efficiency and speed-to-market, ensure quality, and maximize operator safety.


Figure 2: Second-generation or greener route to testosterone. (FIGURES ARE COURTESY OF THE AUTHORS)
The new manufacturing route to testosterone is shown in Figure 2. In the process, the starting material (i.e., androstenedione) is taken into solution and a proprietary intermediate is prepared, crystallized, and filtered. Then, rather than isolating a "dried cake," the intermediate is dissolved off of the filter and cycled back into the original vessel, ready for the next reaction. This scheme is repeated under the final crystallization, which is performed in a workcenter specifically for finishing APIs.

In addition to requiring high volumes of solvent, the "old" testosterone process generated hazardous wastestreams that had to be dealt with during each manufacturing cycle. The process-development phase of the improved testosterone process leveraged existing infrastructure, economies of scale, process telescoping, and systematic application of QbD principles to overcome this and other challenges. More robust earlier process steps enabled the downstream purifications to use fewer solvents and relatively less solvent per kilogram to achieve quality equivalent to the previous process material. A big part of the green process was that it no longer generated a heavy-metals waste stream. These are problematic to dispose of, and eliminating them is a key benefit. The efficiency of the new chemistry allowed the solvent/product ratio to be reduced in later steps, which is a welcomed secondary benefit, and one not realized until the development of the new route.

Using a new intermediate and optimizing reagents were also successfully explored during the development process. The new intermediate enabled the use of a nonmetallic reducing agent, which significantly reduced hazardous waste and improved process safety. Operating a "cleaner" reaction improved efficiency by 50% in the final recrystallization in regard with solvent usage. These results combined to reduce overall hazardous waste streams and boost waste-stream recycling.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
15%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here