Chewing Over API Challenges - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Chewing Over API Challenges
We're all familiar with traditional pills and medicines, but how about medicated chewing gum? Marc Ribe, Pharma Project manager at Cafosa Gum S.A.U, explains how APIs can be incorporated into a novel dosage form that can aid patient compliance.


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 23, Issue 9

Cafosa's excipient Health in Gum is a mix of ingredients to which APIs can be added. How are APIs added to create a novel dosage form?


Marc Ribe
Traditionally, medicated chewing gum has been formulated and manufactured using hot mixing and extrusion procedures, which involve specific equipment that most pharmaceutical companies are not familiar with. Moreover, the use of heat in this process prevents many APIs from being considered because of their sensitivity to high temperature levels.

Our Health in Gum is a homogeneous powder excipient produced using proprietary technology. It is a combination of gum base, softeners and polyols that enables formulation and dry mixing with the API to produce chewing gums by direct compression. Medicated chewing gum is an interesting option for pharmaceutical companies looking to differentiate themselves by introducing products that are more attractive to consumers, but that possess the same efficacy as other dosage forms. In particular, the technology is useful to look at in light of the fact that many people dislike swallowing tablets or other medicines.

Chewing gum is also a convenient drug delivery form because it does not require water intake. In addition, it offers some well-known inherent benefits for oral health, or as a stress or weight management aid, and can be combined with the therapeutic action of an active ingredient to give great performance and improve compliance for consumers.

Importantly for pharma companies, medicated chewing gum is an accepted dosage form in current Pharmacopoeias and the ingredients are compliant with different monographs.

How are common API problems, such as taste masking and solubility, affected by using chewing gum?

Most active ingredients have a bitter and unpleasant taste and in the case of chewing gum, taste masking is of great concern because the residence time in the mouth is much longer (20–30 min) compared with other dosage forms.

However, similar strategies seen in other oral dosage forms can be used; combining flavours and intensive sweeteners has been successful in some cases, while other solutions may require ion exchange resins or complexing agents (e.g., cyclodextrins).

API solubility can be influential in the dissolution rate from the chewing gum matrix. We know that highly soluble APIs are released completely and much faster than slightly or poorly soluble APIs, which require longer chewing times. In some cases, only a percentage of the total drug content is made available. Again, we believe that solubility enhancers used in other dosage forms can be used to good effect in medicated gum to promote higher dissolution of poorly soluble actives. At our company, we’ve worked with poorly-soluble APIs and found that, in some cases, the gum should be chewed for 30 minutes or more to get a 50% release of the APIs. This isn’t like the sustained release of a normal tablet, which can take 3–4 hours in the digestive tract.

For pharmaceutical manufacturers, what are the benefits of packaging APIs in this way? What types of APIs in particular would benefit from being incorporated into chewing gum?

The advantages are that pharmaceutical companies do not have to invest in extra chewing gum equipment in their facilities because our product range uses standard direct compression technology. Chewing gum stability is also very good because the humidity content of the powder is low — much lower than traditional chewing gum made by extrusion. In particular, APIs that are heat and humidity sensitive are good candidates for formulation into medicated gum.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here