Making API Synthesis Greener - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Making API Synthesis Greener
The authors explain chemical transformations that are achievable through certain biocatalytic routes.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 36, Issue 9, pp. s12-s15

The pharmaceutical industry is under severe pressure to make its API processes greener, lower costs, minimize waste, and shorten existing syntheses. The need for economical, robust, scalable, and reliable processes for the synthesis of chiral APIs and intermediates has resulted in process chemists tuning their skills at the interface of chemistry and biology and embracing biocatalysts and biocatalytic processes in organic synthesis. This shift has resulted in biocatalysis becoming the workhorse of the chemists' toolbox for chiral chemistry.


FIgure 1: Possible transformations using biocatalysis (selectAZyme platform, Almac).
Why has there been a surge in the application of this green technology? The key difference in using biocatalysis today compared with 10 years ago is that now all the supporting technologies that can make a difference in enzyme development, such as bioinformatics, enzyme evolution, and high-throughput screening, allow for an efficient turnaround in process development and enzyme evolution. Libraries of enzymes in the form of screening panels that contain all the materials required to screen against a given substrate can be used as an efficient way to identify and use biocatalysts for a given process. For example, the biocatalysis group at Almac has developed the selectAZyme platform, a proprietary platform that consists of a range of enzyme types, including hydrolases, carbonyl reductases, transaminases, P450 monooxygenases, nitrile hydratases, and nitrilases, to provide access to a broad range of chiral compounds, such as acids, esters, alcohols, amines, and amides. Figure 1 illustrates typical transformations performed by the selectAZyme platform.


Figure 2: Example of a timeline for implementation of an enzyme platform (selectAZyme, Almac) involving enzyme selection, scale-up, and commercial manufacture.
The timeline for selection of a given biocatalyst, scale-up, and manufacture of a given product is similar to that of the timelines for conventional chemistry optimization and scale-up. Typical timelines are shown in Figure 2.

Biocatalysis at work

To illustrate the improvements in a synthesis that can be made using biocatalysis, take the example of Phase IIb compound in which nine steps of chemistry resulted in the formation of three chiral centers of a registered starting material with a global yield of 7.4%. The project was initiated with certain key objectives:

  • Increase productivity of the process > 50% kg/L/day
  • Achieve a > 20% reduction in waste
  • Remove expensive and toxic solvents
  • Remove heavy metals and subsequent contamination
  • Remove the necessity for specialized equipment (e.g., original synthesis used high-pressure hydrogenation)
  • Develop a process with consistent quality of product
  • Lower the cost per kilogram of product.

The original chemistry involved a myriad of steps, including a late-stage classical resolution using an expensive amine resolving agent and high-pressure hydrogenation using metal catalysis. The late-stage resolution resulted in large volumes having to be processed to step seven in the original synthesis. Almac's challenge was to make a scalable lower-volume route that had green and cost incentives for changing the process. Almac completed route invention, proof-of-concept demonstration, scale-up of hundreds of kilograms, and final commercial production of metric tons. The revised route consisted of five steps using three different selectAZyme enzymes with a global yield of 23.4%.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
15%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here