Aseptic challenges: the experts' view - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Aseptic challenges: the experts' view
Leading pharmaceutical experts talk to Pharmaceutical Technology Europe about trends and challenges in aseptic techniques and technologies.


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 21, Issue 12

What have been the key innovations that have shaped current aseptic practices and techniques?


Jerold Martin
Henderson: The number one consideration for aseptic practices and technique is risk minimization. Since the mid-1990s, the development of isolators and restricted access barrier systems (RABS) has substantially changed how operators interact with sterile drug product and their associated technique. A physical barrier between the operator and the critical zone of the isolator controlled at positive pressure with HEPAfiltered air creates a high level of contamination control. Most interactions through isolators and RABS are done through glove ports, which again limits the risk to the associated product. In addition, the ability to biodecontaminate the critical zone and clean-in-place/steam-in-place (CIP/SIP) contact parts has led to less operator involvement and further reduces risk. Magriotis: Isolation technology is replacing conventional clean room aseptic technology within the most developed areas of the pharmaceutical industry. The technology's major benefit is the higher aseptic conditions that can be achieved and maintained during manufacturing. Isolators provide a complete barrier between product and operators, who are the highest source of contamination in aseptic processing. Isolators also guarantee a higher sterility assurance level after decontamination compared with conventional clean room technology (usually 6 Log contaminants reduction versus 3 Log reduction). This is achieved by means of vaporized hydrogen peroxide.


(George Doyle/Getty Images)
Furthermore, in 2008, the European Commission issued a GMP document for sterile drugs preparation stating that the sealing of sterile vials with aluminium caps must happen under Grade A laminar air flow. Consequently, the most innovative machinery manufacturers have reviewed the design of their aluminium capping machines; the latest models incorporate features that make them suitable to work under laminar air flow and that minimize particle generation to maintain the required level of air cleanliness. Martin: Key innovations have been singleuse systems (processscale filter capsules, tubing, biocontainers, etc.), which are presterilized (by gamma irradiation) and preassembled to eliminate aseptic connections and cleaning. These systems have been further enabled by the introduction of sterile connectors. Use of singleuse systems and sterile connectors reduces risk of both microbial contamination and chemical contamination from lottolot or producttoproduct carryover or from cleaning agent residues. Because they are closed systems, they can even enable sterile processing to be done outside of isolators or Class A environments.


David Henderson Jr
Another key innovation is the development of new high capacity 0.1µm-rated filters with high mycoplasma removal capability. These are used for sterilizing filtration of soy peptonebased bacterial culture media used in aseptic filling line validation to ensure the absence of mycoplasma, such as Acholeplasma laidlawii, in the sterile media fill validation of the aseptic filling line.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
14%
To select process for new products only
23%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
25%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here