Controlling Nucleation - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Controlling Nucleation


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe


Mark Shon. VP of Sales and Marketing for SP Scientific.
Ideally, all product formulations should experience the same conditions when it comes to lyophilisation as this leads to final product homogeneity. In practice, however, nucleation can occur. Nucleation is a random process and has proven difficult for the industry to control. During the freezing stage, some vials may nucleate close to the thermodynamic freezing point of the formulation (e.g., -3 ∘C), while others may nucleate at -20 ∘C or lower much later in the freezing step. Consequently, all the vials will behave somewhat differently because the temperature at which nucleation occurs ultimately determines the resistance to the water vapour flow out of the frozen sample during freeze drying. The lower the temperature when nucleation occurs, the longer the cycle time. Many other adverse effects have also been attributed to uncontrolled nucleation (Table I).

Controlling nucleation


Table 1: The effects of uncontrolled nucleation.
A number of techniques for controlling nucleation have been previously described, including the ice fog technique and ultrasound.(1,2) One technique that could offer potential for controlling nucleation is a technology developed by Praxair Inc (ControLyo) that enables ‘nucleation on-demand’. The technique involves cooling vials to a temperature at which nucleation can occur and then pressurising the system with nitrogen or argon gas. The freeze dryer is then rapidly de-pressurized and all vials nucleate simultaneously. The benefits include reduced cycle times, improved homogeneity of product, less damage from freezing, reduced vial breakage and an overall process that is generally more in conformity with quality by design initiatives. In addition, the technology is repeatable, scalable and has a large body of documented experimental data to validate its efficacy and benefits.(3)

In the initial work conducted by Praxair, they demonstrated controlled nucleation in freeze dryers as large as 5 m2. In a drying time optimisation experiment conducted by Praxair in collaboration with Baxter BioPharma Solutions, primary drying time was reduced 41% in the controlled compared with the uncontrolled nucleation run.3 Given the cost of freeze drying, cycle time reduction is a critical goal in the industry. Praxair has now implemented the technology on larger production freeze dryers. The hurdle is probably not the scalability of the technology, but the time and cost of a manufacturer having to revalidate an entire process once the technology has been incorporated. Because of this, the technology may be more practical for a new drug formulation where validation has yet to be performed.

There is significant data that clearly show the benefits of controlled nucleation,4 but most of these have been generated using development freeze dryers. The real commercial benefit of any technology will come when it is adapted for production freeze dryers. Controlling nucleation will also benefit biological products. We have conducted work with lactate dehydrogenase and human growth hormone, which are both sensitive proteins. Controlled nucleation led to less protein aggregation and greater stability and function of the proteins after lyophilisation.

References

1. S. Rhambhatla et al., AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech., 5(4), e58 (2004).

2. A. Hottot, K. Nakagawa and J. Andrieu, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 86(2), 193–200 (2008).

3. Data held on file at Praxair and SP Scientific.

4. R. Sever, CPPR Freeze-Drying of Pharmaceuticals and Biologicals Conference (Garmisch, Germany, 2010).

http://www.spscientific.com

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
14%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
41%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
11%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here