Direct Compression Versus Granulation - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Direct Compression Versus Granulation


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 23, Issue 3

Compressed tablets are the most widely used solid dosage form so they must satisfy a number of physical requirements in terms of hardness, disintegration ability, friability and uniformity. To provide these tablet characteristics in accordance with the chosen ingredients, manufacturers can use three different processing technologies: direct compression, dry granulation and wet granulation.

Direct compression

Direct compression is a popular choice because it provides the shortest, most effective and least complex way to produce tablets. The manufacturer can blend an API with the excipient and the lubricant, followed by compression, which makes the product easy to process. No additional processing steps are required.

Moisture or heatsensitive ingredients, which would be contraindicated in wet granulation, can also be used in this type of process. However, it does require a very critical selection of excipients in comparison to granulation processes because the raw materials must demonstrate good flowability and compressibility for successful operation.

Both high and low doses of API present a challenge in this respect. Most APIs tend to have poor compressibility, which affects the quality of tablets if the formulation calls for a large proportion of API. At the same time, there can also be problems when low amounts of actives need to be incorporated into tablets because it is difficult to accurately blend a small amount of active in a large amount of excipient to achieve the desired uniformity and homogeneity.

For instance, segregation of the different components can occur. This means there is not a uniform distribution of tablet ingredients being fed to the press, and thus batchtobatch consistency of the manufactured tablet cannot be assured.

One of the principal risk factors for segregation is the wide particle size distribution in direct compression formulations, in which active ingredients tend to be at the fine end of the range. Where there is a wide range of particle sizes, there is an increased likelihood of sifting, where the smaller particles 'slip through' the bigger ones.

Other bulk powder properties are also important for successful tabletting, such as good flowability, and all of these factors combine to place a high requirement on the excipients used for direct compression.

Granulation

If a powder blend's properties do not suit direct compression tabletting, manufacturers will turn to granulation processes to create the desired flowability and low dustability. These characteristics are required to minimise tablet weight variations, and ensure high density for high tablet filling weight and high moldability for hard tablet manufacture.

Granulation narrows the particle size distribution of a tablet formulation's bulk powder, eliminating segregation problems. This in turn ensures superior compressibility in the tabletting process, permitting higher quantities of API to be used and ensuring good active distribution in the tablet. However, granulation is a more time-consuming technique compared with direct compression and there is also a risk of product cross-contamination and product loss during the different processing steps (granulation, drying, sieving). All of these factors can increase costs compared with direct compression.

Dry granulation is more flexible than direct compression. Compared with wet granulation, however, it has a shorter, more cost-effective manufacturing process. Because it does not entail heat or moisture, dry granulation is especially suitable for active ingredients that are sensitive to solvents, or labile to moisture and elevated temperatures.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
23%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
14%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
7%
All of the above.
47%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
9%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerOutside Looking In
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAdvances in Large-Scale Heterocyclic Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler New Era for Generic Drugs
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoTackling Drug Shortages
New Congress to Tackle Health Reform, Biomedical Innovation, Tax Policy
Combination Products Challenge Biopharma Manufacturers
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here