News - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

News

Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 23, Issue 2

GSK to pay more than $4 billion for criminal and legal charges

Headlines have been full of news about GlaxoSmithKline in recent weeks and none of it has been particularly flattering for the company. Firstly, January saw the airing of a US program (60 Minutes) about a whistleblower lawsuit that resulted in GSK paying $750 million to settle civil and criminal charges after the company was accused of manufacturing and selling adulterated drug products to Medicaid and other government health plans. The products were manufactured at the company's Cidra plant in Puerto Rico, which was closed in 2009 due to declining demand.


Cornstock/Getty Images
The 60 Minutes programme interviewed whistleblower Cheryl Eckard, a former GSK Quality Assurance Manager. According to documents from Getnick & Getnick law firm, Eckard learned of "serious and systemic violations of manufacturing standards" at the Cidra factory in 2002 and urged managers to take action.

"All the systems were broken, the facility was broken, the equipment was broken, the processes were broken. It was the worst thing I had run across in my career," said Eckhard on the 60 Minutes programme.

Eckard claims that nothing was done. She was made redundant in 2003 and filed the whistleblower suit in February 2004, ultimately leading to the FDA seizing all stocks of Avandamet and Paxil CR manufactured at Cidra — the largest seizure in FDA history. The FDA also placed the Cidra plant under a Consent Decree, requiring that all products released to the market be approved by an independent monitor.

The 60 Minutes programme will have been a harsh blow to GSK's reputation, with claims being made that some medicines may have been contaminated with bacteria or mislabelled, while others may have been too strong or not strong enough. Additionally, claims were made that GSK tried to cover up the problems after a pharmacist called to report a mix up with an antidepressant medicine.

"They [GSK] filed a report with the FDA that said that the mix-up was not real. And did not happen at the factory," said Eckard in the programme.

In its response to the programme, GSK says that it regrets the manufacturing issues at the Cidra facility and "strongly disagrees with 60 Minutes' implication that patients suffered harm as a result". GSK also emphasised that the issues outlined in the 60 Minutes story occurred between 2001 and early 2005, and related to one manufacturing facility. "GSK had been working with the FDA to improve the plant's performance as early as 2001, before Cheryl Eckard was sent in 2002 as part of the team to address issues cited by the FDA," said a GSK statement.

The company also added: "The FDA; the US Department of Justice; and Neil Getnick, Cheryl Eckard's attorney, all stated that there was no indication that patients were harmed as a result of the production issues."

Avandia legal charges

On top of the $750 million, GSK also recently announced that it is expecting to pay an enormous $3.4 billion to settle legal charges relating to its diabetes drug Avandia, as well as sales and promotional practices in the US for other products. The amount is in addition to the $2.36 billion legal charges previously announced in July 2010 for legal cases regarding Avandia, Paxil and the former site at Cidra.

Since this time, GSK says it has continued to receive a "substantial" number of new product liability cases regarding Avandia in the US. The $3.4 billion estimate stems from the company's assessment of the additional cases and an estimate of likely future claims.

The charges also relate to an investigation by the US Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado into GSK's US sales and promotional practices between 1997 and 2004.

According to third-party sources, the charges may wipe out the company's expected earnings for Q1.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here