News - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

News

Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 4, Issue 23

Will free trade prevail?

According to media reports, April could see the long-awaited conclusion to the EU and India's Free Trade Agreement (FTA), but only if arguments about intellectual property provisions and their impact on generic medicines can be resolved!

The FTA has been under negotiation between the two regions since 2007. According to the European Commission, India is one of the EU's most important trade partners; however, India still maintains "substantial tariff and nontariff barriers that hinder trade with the EU". In 2009, it was estimated that an FTA would help boost bilateral trade between the EU and India to more than €160 billion by 2015.

In 2009, MEPs hoped that the agreement would be signed by the end of 2010, but negotiations are still ongoing. One particular hurdle has been concern from numerous organisations that the FTA will impact access to generic medicines — particularly for developing countries, which strongly rely on India for cheap alternatives to branded medicines. India has been able to produce so many affordable versions of medicines patented elsewhere because it did not grant patents on medicines until 2005 when it began complying with World Trade Organisation standards. Prior to this time, patents were only offered on processes, which meant that a product or medicine could legally be duplicated as long as it used a different process. Unsurprisingly, this landscape initially deterred many western companies from launching products in India.

Now, the EU is pushing to further increase India's intellectual property laws to help combat global counterfeiting. According to the European Parliament, India is one of the major sources of counterfeit medicines seized by EU customs — accounting for 30% of total seizures.

Blocking access to medicines

A number of organisations believe that the new laws may potentially affect access to Indian generic medicines. International charity, Medecins sans Frontieres, explained in a statement: "The EU is pushing for intellectual property provisions in the FTA that exceed what international trade rules require. The most damaging measure is so-called 'data exclusivity', which would act like a patent and block more affordable generic medicines from the market, even for drugs that are already off patent, or do not merit a patent to begin with."

Opposition against the FTA provisions also sparked an international day of action at the beginning of March, with more than 5000 participants.

The EU has acknowledged these concerns, but believes that the FTA will not affect access. A statement from the EU Delegation to Tanzania explained that it believes the fears are based on a misunderstanding of the EU's objectives and negotiation position. According to the statement, the EU has proposed a clause in the negotiations to ensure that nothing in the FTA prevents India from producing and exporting medicines to developing countries. "The EU is fully aware that India is an important provider of generic medicines to other developing countries; the FTA currently under negotiations between India and the EU is certainly not intended to restrict the ability of India to continue doing the same for domestic and international consumption."

The next round of talks concerning the FTA will take place in April, and some believe that the agreement could be concluded around this time, although the actual signing is unlikely to take place before the next EU–India summit. European pharma companies will no doubt be watching closely. If pushed through, the provisions will better protect pharmaceutical products and go some way to combating counterfeits.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What impact do mega-mergers of biopharmaceutical companies have on the development of new drugs?
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
Has no impact on drug development.
Do not know.
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
29%
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
54%
Has no impact on drug development.
4%
Do not know.
13%
Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing No Longer Just for Cost-Cutting
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerSeeking Alternative Catalyst Solutions
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Global Expansion Shapes Drug Oversight
Chris Burgess Statistical Solutions Chris BurgessIs a Sample Size of n=6 a Magic Number?
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoRegulating the Environmental Impact of Pharmaceuticals
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
USP Faces New Challenges
Report: Pfizer Makes $101 Billion Offer to AstraZeneca
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here