AstraZeneca's Crestor Patents Ruled Invalid in Australia - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

AstraZeneca's Crestor Patents Ruled Invalid in Australia


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

AstraZeneca's three patents protecting Crestor (rosuvastatin) have been ruled invalid by the Federal Court of Australia. The patents include a formulation patent expiring in 2020, a patent related to the use of rosuvastatin for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, which will expire in 2021, and a patent for treating hypercholesterolaemia with an expiry date of 2020. These patents were challenged by Apotex, Watson Pharma, and Ascent Pharma.

AstraZeneca has expressed disappointment in the court’s ruling on the validity of these three patents. The company is, however, committed to defending its intellectual property protecting Crestor in Australia. This decision is being carefully reviewed while AstraZeneca continues to evaluate all legal options at this stage, which could include filing an appeal and seeking to maintain existing preliminary injunctions.

A press release from the company has stated that the decision of the Federal Court only applies in Australia and will have no impact on the validity of Crestor patents in other countries. It also does not affect AstraZeneca’s financial guidance for 2013, which will, in accordance with normal practice, be reviewed in conjunction with the announcement of the company's first quarter financial results on Apr. 25, 2013.

Sales of Crestor in Australia amounted to approximately $350 million in 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here