AstraZeneca's Crestor Patents Ruled Invalid in Australia - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

AstraZeneca's Crestor Patents Ruled Invalid in Australia


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

AstraZeneca's three patents protecting Crestor (rosuvastatin) have been ruled invalid by the Federal Court of Australia. The patents include a formulation patent expiring in 2020, a patent related to the use of rosuvastatin for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, which will expire in 2021, and a patent for treating hypercholesterolaemia with an expiry date of 2020. These patents were challenged by Apotex, Watson Pharma, and Ascent Pharma.

AstraZeneca has expressed disappointment in the court’s ruling on the validity of these three patents. The company is, however, committed to defending its intellectual property protecting Crestor in Australia. This decision is being carefully reviewed while AstraZeneca continues to evaluate all legal options at this stage, which could include filing an appeal and seeking to maintain existing preliminary injunctions.

A press release from the company has stated that the decision of the Federal Court only applies in Australia and will have no impact on the validity of Crestor patents in other countries. It also does not affect AstraZeneca’s financial guidance for 2013, which will, in accordance with normal practice, be reviewed in conjunction with the announcement of the company's first quarter financial results on Apr. 25, 2013.

Sales of Crestor in Australia amounted to approximately $350 million in 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here