EC Closes Servier Investigation - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

EC Closes Servier Investigation

The European Commission (EC) has closed an investigation into Servier that accused the company of providing “misleading” and “incorrect” information to the EC’s pharmaceutical sector inquiry. Another case examining Servier for breaking EU rules by using restrictive agreements and abusing its dominant marketing position, however, is still ongoing.

At the end of last week, the EC released a statement explaining that it had dropped the investigation, which was launched in 2010, after Servier put forward various arguments as to why the information it supplied in response to the EC’s inquiry was neither misleading nor incorrect. Investigating the arguments would use considerable resources, so the EC has instead decided to focus on the “substantive enforcement of competition rules in a number of pending cases, including one involving Servier”.

The open case began in July 2009, and involves several generic drug companies in addition to Servier. The proceedings concern “unilateral behaviour” by Servier and agreements that may have been made with the specific intention of hindering the European market entry of a generic form of Servier’s cardiovascular medicine perindopril.

The EU pharmaceutical sector inquiry

In 2008–2009, the EC conducted a competition inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector, which included surprise inspections on companies and requests for information, such as documents relating to litigation and settlement agreements. One particular focus for the inquiry was identifying the cause behind the delayed market entry of generic products. The inquiry concluded that generics were being delayed due to four main factors:

  • patenting strategies such as patent clusters
  • disputes and litigation against potential generic competitors
  • patent settlements with generic companies
  • various interventions and the launch of follow-on products.

Since this time, the EC has opened investigations into several companies, including pharma giants Novartis and J&J in 2011. In addition, however, the EC reported in 2011 that it had seen a decrease in “problematic” pharmaceutical patent settlements.

Related articles

2012: A Good, Bad or Ugly Year for Servier?

EC probes J&J and Novartis

Servier under EC scrutiny for anticompetitive behaviour

EC final report condemns industry malpractice


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
| Weekly

What impact do mega-mergers of biopharmaceutical companies have on the development of new drugs?
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
Has no impact on drug development.
Do not know.
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
Has no impact on drug development.
Do not know.
Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing No Longer Just for Cost-Cutting
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerSeeking Alternative Catalyst Solutions
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Global Expansion Shapes Drug Oversight
Chris Burgess Statistical Solutions Chris BurgessIs a Sample Size of n=6 a Magic Number?
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoRegulating the Environmental Impact of Pharmaceuticals
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
USP Faces New Challenges
Report: Pfizer Makes $101 Billion Offer to AstraZeneca

Click here