EC Fines Lundbeck Over 'Pay-for-Delay' Deals in Europe - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

EC Fines Lundbeck Over 'Pay-for-Delay' Deals in Europe
Lundbeck and eight other pharmaceutical companies have been fined for delaying generic entry of the blockbuster antidepressant, Celexa (citalopram), into the market.



Lundbeck and eight other pharmaceutical companies have been fined a total of €146 million for delaying generic entry of the blockbuster antidepressant, Celexa (citalopram), into the market.

Lundbeck and eight other pharmaceutical companies have been fined a total of €146 million by the European Commission (EC) for delaying generic entry of the blockbuster antidepressant, Celexa (citalopram), into the market.

Following a three-year investigation on Lundbeck, the EC concluded that an agreement between Lundbeck and several generic drugmakers, which effectively prevented cheaper generic versions of Celexa from entering the market, was a violation of the EU antitrust rules that prohibit anticompetitive agreements (Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – TFEU). Lundbeck incurred a fine of €93.8 million, while the other generic companies involved in the infringement, including Alpharma (now part of Zoetis), Merck KGaA, Generics UK (part of Mylan), Actavis unit Arrow and Ranbaxy, were fined a total of €52.2 million.

"It is unacceptable that a company pays off its competitors to stay out of its market and delay the entry of cheaper medicines. Agreements of this type directly harm patients and national health systems, which are already under tight budgetary constraints. The Commission will not tolerate such anticompetitive practices," said Joaquín Almunia, vice-president of the EC, in a press statement.

Celexa was Lundbeck's best-selling product for many years. Following the expiry of Lundbeck’s basic patent for the citalopram molecule, generics could have entered the market but the Danish drugmaker paid incentives to generic manufacturers, such as cash sums and stock purchases, to keep their generic versions of the drug off the market. Lundbeck also offered guaranteed profits as part of distribution agreement, according to the EC. The EC’s fines were based on its 2006 guidelines on fines (IP/06/857 and MEMO/06/256).

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
70%
Breakthrough designations
4%
Protecting the supply chain
17%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
2%
More stakeholder involvement
7%
View Results
Eric Langerr Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerTargeting Different Off-Shore Destinations
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAsymmetric Synthesis Continues to Advance
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Data Integrity Key to GMP Compliance
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoExtending the Scope of Pharmacovigilance Comes at a Price
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Ebola Outbreak Raises Ethical Issues
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 2: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Communications
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 1: Challenges and Changes

Click here