EMA Sides With Former Executive Director - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

EMA Sides With Former Executive Director



In a press release on Mar. 21, 2011, the EMA Management Board gave its approval for the current activities of former executive director Thomas Lönngren.

Lönngren, who stepped down on Dec. 31, 2010, came under fire from a number of organisations that claimed conflict-of-interest rules might have been breached. In particular, the letter, dated Feb. 24, 2010, expressed concern that “there was no ‘cooling off’ period between his former and current employment”.

Though the EMA Management Board approved Lönngren’s recent appointments, they were quick to state that the agency’s role in protecting the public interest and maintaining a good reputation were being taken seriously.

The Board based its decision on two factors: “Firstly, whether any activity risked the misuse of confidential or privileged information gained during his leadership of the Agency and secondly whether any activity risked improper influence on decisions taken by the Agency.” The Board concluded that there was no risk as presented by communications with Lönngren, but expressed regret at his tardiness in notifying them of the new appointments.

Despite the approval, the Board imposed a set of limitations that will remain in place for a period of two years with immediate effect, which stated that he should not:

  • take managerial/executive positions in the pharma industry
  • provide product-related advice on activities within EMA’s remit
  • have contact with Agency staff or committee members in a professional context
  • represent or accompany third parties at meetings with the agency.

In making its decision and supporting documents public, the EMA hopes to ensure accountability whilst appeasing the concerns raised by the five European public-health and transparency campaigners involved.

www.ema.europa.eu

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
23%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
14%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
7%
All of the above.
47%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
9%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerOutside Looking In
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAdvances in Large-Scale Heterocyclic Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler New Era for Generic Drugs
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoTackling Drug Shortages
New Congress to Tackle Health Reform, Biomedical Innovation, Tax Policy
Combination Products Challenge Biopharma Manufacturers
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality

Click here