GlaxoSmithKline Acknowledges Misrepresentation in Scientific Article - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

GlaxoSmithKline Acknowledges Misrepresentation in Scientific Article
One employee is dismissed, another has resigned, and three others are put on administrative leave.


GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) issued a statement to say it and the scientific publication Nature Medicine recently became aware of allegations of misrepresentation of data in a research paper written by scientists at GSK’s China research center and published in Nature Medicine in 2010 (1). The published study was from preclinical, early-stage research and did not directly involve patients, according to GSK. The article examined the role of interleukin-7 in T helper type 17 cell survival and expansion in treating autoimmune disease.

“The integrity of our research is critical to our work and when these allegations came to light, we immediately contacted the journal to tell them that we were taking the charges seriously and would be investigating thoroughly,” said GSK in the statement. “Regretfully, our investigation has established that certain data in the paper were indeed misrepresented. We’ve shared our conclusion that the paper should be retracted and are in the process of asking all of the authors to sign a statement to that effect, according to Nature Medicine’s procedure.”

GSK says that one individual has been dismissed from GSK, a second has submitted his resignation, and three others have been placed on administrative leave, pending a final review. “We are committed to the highest ethical and scientific standards and regulators, physicians, and patients can have confidence in the research we carry out.” said GSK in its statement.

Reference 1. X. Liu et al., Nature Medicine 16 (2), 191-197 (2010).

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
35%
Breakthrough designations
12%
Protecting the supply chain
35%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
12%
More stakeholder involvement
6%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
NIH Translational Research Partnership Yields Promising Therapy
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
USP Faces New Challenges

Click here