GlaxoSmithKline Divests Brands in Australia for $271 Million - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

GlaxoSmithKline Divests Brands in Australia for $271 Million


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is selling the majority of its ‘classic brands’ in Australia to Aspen Global for approximately £172 million ($271.1 million) in cash. The move is part of GSK’s ongoing strategy to simplify business by selling low-growth and noncore assets in order to focus on priority brands, products and pipeline opportunities.

The divested brands comprise 25 products that have been genericised or that are no longer promoted by the company, including the herpes medicine Valtrex, beta-lactam antibiotic Timentin, and the epilepsy and bipolar drug Lamictal. The brands generated around £83 million ($130.8 million) in total sales in 2011 and £31 million ($48.9 million) in the first half of 2012. In a statement, GSK explained that revenues for the products had gradually declined in recent years because of “local market price reductions and generic competition”.

However, Aspen added in a statement, “Whilst the Products received little promotional focus from GSK, Aspen is confident that it will be able to leverage its proven ability to reinvigorate older brands and the Products’ considerable brand equity in order to enhance the value of the portfolio.”

The divestment is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of this year, subject to regulatory approvals.

Earlier this year, GSK divested several over-the-counter brands in select territories to Aspen for approximately $264.7 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
24%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
10%
All of the above.
44%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
10%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here