J&J Ordered to Pay $327 Million Penalty in False-Claim Suit - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

J&J Ordered to Pay $327 Million Penalty in False-Claim Suit


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

A South Carolina court found that Ortho-McNeill-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson (J&J), violated state consumer-protection laws by using misleading marketing for its antipsychotic drug, Risperdal. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the maker of the drug, received a Warning Letter from FDA in April 2004 over misleading product claims made in a “Dear Doctor” letter that the company sent to healthcare providers in November 2003. According to FDA, the Janssen promotional material minimized the risks of hyperglycemia-related adverse events associated with Risperdal, and misleadingly claimed that Risperdal was safer than other atypical antipsychotics.

The South Carolina court ordered J&J to pay $327 million in fines. According to an article in Bloomberg, Circuit Court Judge Roger Couch assessed a $300 penalty per sample box of the drug that was distributed and a $4000 penalty for the publication of the “Dear Doctor” letter, for a total penalty of more than $327 million. A much larger penalty could have been assessed if the fines had been levied on a per-prescription basis.

J&J plans to appeal the ruling. According to Bloomberg, the South Carolina case is one of about 10 such suits brought by states over misleading marketing of Risperdal. J&J succeeded in getting the charges dismissed in a similar suit in Pennsylvania and won an appeal after being fined in West Virginia, after which the state dropped its case.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here