Physical Chemical Identifiers Play a Role in New FDA Anticounterfeiting Draft Guidance - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Physical Chemical Identifiers Play a Role in New FDA Anticounterfeiting Draft Guidance


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

Untitled Document

The US Food and Drug Administration issued a draft guidance for industry, Incorporation of Physical-Chemical Identifiers into Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products for Anticounterfeiting, on July 13. The draft guidance focuses on the use of inks, pigments, flavors, and other physical-chemical identifiers (PCIDs) to make drug products more difficult to duplicate by counterfeiters, and to make it easier to identify the genuine version of the drug, according to an FDA release.

“Drug counterfeiting is a serious public health concern,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg in the release. “We look forward to working with industry to help ensure that consumers are not exposed to products containing unknown, ineffective, or harmful ingredients.”

According to the press release, PCID is defined as “a substance or combination of substances possessing a unique physical or chemical property used to identify and authenticate a drug product or dosage. In addition to inks, pigments, and flavors, specific chemicals may be used as molecular tags in a PCID.”

The draft guidance recommends that drug manufacturers use the lowest level of PCID possible and to ensure that the PCID used has no medicinal effect. The PCID should be placed within the dosage form to avoid interaction with the drug’s active ingredient, according to the press release.

PCIDs can be easily detected in most cases by wholesalers or pharmacists to determine a product’s authenticity, but occasionally, analytical instruments are necessary to identify a PCID within a product. FDA believes that many potential PCIDs are already in use as food additives, colorants, or other types of inactive ingredients with established safety profiles, according to the release.

Comments on the draft guidance can be submitted electronically to FDA.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What impact do mega-mergers of biopharmaceutical companies have on the development of new drugs?
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
Has no impact on drug development.
Do not know.
Improves the quality and number of innovative drugs available to patients.
29%
Restricts innovation and the development of new drugs.
54%
Has no impact on drug development.
4%
Do not know.
13%
Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing No Longer Just for Cost-Cutting
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerSeeking Alternative Catalyst Solutions
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Global Expansion Shapes Drug Oversight
Chris Burgess Statistical Solutions Chris BurgessIs a Sample Size of n=6 a Magic Number?
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoRegulating the Environmental Impact of Pharmaceuticals
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
USP Faces New Challenges
Report: Pfizer Makes $101 Billion Offer to AstraZeneca
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here