US Supreme Court to Hear Pay-for-Delay Case - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

US Supreme Court to Hear Pay-for-Delay Case



The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday, Dec. 7, 2012, to hear a case that will decide whether brand-name drug companies may pay generic drug companies to delay introduction of lower-cost generic drugs. At the request of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the US Solicitor General petitioned the Supreme Court to review a federal appeals court ruling that upheld a “pay-for-delay” arrangement between Solvay Pharmaceuticals, now owned by Abbott Laboratories, and generic-drug makers, such as Watson Pharmaceuticals, Paddock Laboratories, and Par Pharmaceutical. A decision on the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. (No. 12-416) is expected by the end of June 2013.

The FTC filed a complaint in 2009 alleging that the companies violated antitrust laws when Solvay paid the generic firms in exchange for their agreement to abandon patent challenges and refrain from marketing a generic version of AndroGel until 2015, noted the FTC in an Oct. 4, 2012 press release. A district court dismissed the FTC complaint, and, in April 2012, the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled against the FTC and upheld the arrangement.

Drug companies say the settlements, also known as reverse payments, are a legitimate way to settle patent disputes. The FTC, however, says that the arrangements hurt American consumers. Other court cases over the last several years have dealt with the pay-for-delay practice, and the Supreme Court ruling is anticipated to set a national standard.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing

Click here