How to Build a Better Outsourcing Relationship - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

How to Build a Better Outsourcing Relationship
What should contractors and their clients bear in mind when they collaborate on a project?


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 32, Issue 1

So you've decided to hire a contract manufacturing organization (CMO) to produce your clinical-trial materials (CTM). Or you've just signed a deal to provide your services to a top-tier pharmaceutical company. But how do you ensure that the project goes smoothly? Which factors will guarantee that the job is completed successfully? CMOs, pharmaceutical companies, and consultants offered Pharmaceutical Technology some interesting answers.

All sides agree that accurate and timely communication is a big requirement for a successful outsourcing relationship. "Transparency is key in building good information flow," according to Scott Houlton, chief operating officer of Aptuit (Greenwich, CT), a contract drug-development services company. Partners must be readily available to answer questions and offer details about the work at hand. This way, CMOs are sure to understand the project's specifications, and pharmaceutical companies will know about problems that arise.

"Another key," Houlton adds, "is to have consistent, ongoing work so that the communication stays fresh." Sharing one major project or many small projects forces sponsors and clients to exchange information regularly. Regular contact helps both parties achieve goals and keeps everyone updated about the project's status.

In addition, a successful outsourcing partnership requires a great deal of strategic planning, according to Nailesh Bhatt, managing director of the consulting and advisory firm Proximare (Princeton, NJ). Outsourcing relationships are evolving to the point that pharmaceutical companies are "actually talking about tactical strategies with each of the partners," Bhatt comments. Companies are "getting extremely granular," he continues. They might ask a CMO whether it would manufacture their product locally or overseas. They could ask how the CMO's strategy will affect timelines, cost, and product quality. Suppliers are realizing that they must have answers for these questions, Bhatt observes.

Houlton agrees that partners must join to develop a strategy for the project. They should spend time "planning for success rather than reacting to last-minute changes," he says.

Maureen Spataro, founder and president of the consulting firm Spataro and Associates (Wilmington, NC), specifies the kind of planning that contractors and their clients must perform. She says the parties should establish master agreements that detail the "clearly defined deliverables" for which the provider and sponsor are responsible.

A plan must also incorporate realistic timelines that both sides agree to, Spataro continues. Establishing deadlines and sticking to them is crucial, as Anthony Moult, director of global clinical-trials supplies at UCB Pharm (Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium), emphasizes. "We might be happy with a CMO," he remarks, "but if they can't meet our timelines, we go elsewhere."

But possibly the most important (and most obvious) factor in a positive outsourcing relationship is cooperation. CMOs and pharmaceutical companies must build "cooperative relationships" for their projects to be realized successfully, according to Bhatt. "A great deal of collaboration and a lot of back and forth are involved. It's a consultative approach," he explains.

"Both parties should have a mutual investment in the success of the relationship," Houlton adds. Spataro echoes this sentiment by noting that each party must meet its commitments. "If either party has too much of the influence," Houlton says, "then the relationship suffers." When an outsourcing relationship has a foundation of trust, he continues, work can proceed efficiently because the sponsor will have less need to verify the outsourcing partner's work.

For more on this topic, see "Outsourcing Clinical-Trial Materials Heats Up"

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
24%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
10%
All of the above.
44%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
10%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here