EMA Sides with Former Executive Director - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

EMA Sides with Former Executive Director


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

In a press release on Mar. 21, 2011, the EMA Management Board gave its approval for the current activities of former executive director Thomas Lönngren.

Lönngren, who stepped down on Dec. 31, 2010, came under fire from several organisations that claimed that his move to a new position as an advisor to the private pharmaceutical sector might have breached conflict-of-interest rules. In particular, the groups' letter, dated Feb. 25, 2010, expressed concern that “there was no ‘cooling off’ period between his former and current employment."

Though the EMA Management Board approved Lönngren’s recent appointments, it was quick to state that it took the agency’s role in protecting the public interest and maintaining a good reputation seriously.

The board based its decision on two factors: “Firstly, whether any activity risked the misuse of confidential or privileged information gained during his leadership of the Agency and secondly whether any activity risked improper influence on decisions taken by the Agency.” The board concluded that no risk was posed, but expressed regret at Lönngren's tardiness in notifying it of his new appointments.

Despite the approval, the board imposed a set of limitations that will remain in place for a period of two years effective immediately. The limitations forbid Lönngren to take the following actions:

  • Taking managerial or executive positions in the pharmceutical industry
  • Providing product-related advice on activities within EMA’s remit
  • Having contact with agency staff or committee members in a professional context
  • Representing or accompanying third parties at meetings with the agency

By making its decision and supporting documents public, the EMA hopes to ensure accountability and allay the concerns that five European public-health and transparency campaigners raised.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
21%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
26%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
21%
Do not use QbD
21%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here