New Challenges for Use of Embryonic Stem Cells - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

New Challenges for Use of Embryonic Stem Cells


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) definition of embryonic stem (ES) cells poses new challenges for investigators who seek federal research funding. Current NIH guidelines narrowly define ES cells, as “cells that are derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst stage human embryos, are capable of dividing without differentiating for a prolonged period in culture, and are known to develop into cells and tissues of the three primary germ layers" (1). 

More than 75 such cell lines have been approved to receive federal funding for research. A smaller subset of ES cells, however, has been excluded from funding because it does nott meet the narrow definition. ES cells can now be derived from a single blastomere taken from an eight-cell embryo, in a procedure similar to that used during genetic testing on embryos created by in vitro fertilization. After the blastomere is removed, the embryo remains viable and is refrozen. Although this procedure does not destroy human embryos, cell lines derived in this fashion are currently awaiting further review by NIH.  

FDA has given Advanced Cell Technology clearance to start clinical trials for macular degeneration this year using cells produced from a blastomere-derived ES cell line. The company was forced to find alternative sources of funding for their trial since their cell line is not eligible to receive federal funds.

In Europe, regulations regarding embryonic stem-cell research differ from country to country. However, a ruling on Mar. 10, 2011, by the European Court of Justice of the European Communities denied patents on ES cells to Oliver Brüstle of the University of Bonn on ethical grounds. The court found that even if cell lines could be established without the destruction of embryos, the commercialization of human embryos was unacceptable, and contrary to public policy. This ruling may push European countries to adopt restrictive policies regarding embryonic stem cells and inhibit the development of ES-based therapies.

Reference

(1) National Institutes of Health, “Guidelines for Research Using Human Stem Cells,” (Bethesda, MD, July 2009), stemcells.nih.gov/policy/2009guidelines.htm

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
70%
Breakthrough designations
4%
Protecting the supply chain
17%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
2%
More stakeholder involvement
7%
View Results
Eric Langerr Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerTargeting Different Off-Shore Destinations
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAsymmetric Synthesis Continues to Advance
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Data Integrity Key to GMP Compliance
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoExtending the Scope of Pharmacovigilance Comes at a Price
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Ebola Outbreak Raises Ethical Issues
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 2: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Communications
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 1: Challenges and Changes
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here