PharmTech: In your opinion, how successful has the industry been in fighting drug counterfeiting over the past few years? How would
you describe the prevalence of the problem today?
Davison: The situation is totally different depending on where in the world you look. In the EU and US, one would be unlucky to come
across a counterfeit medicine. However, as the recent Avastin case (1) showed, even these relatively well-controlled supply
chains are vulnerable. In many developing countries, counterfeit drugs constitute a lethal epidemic that is killing thousands
of people every year. Most fake drugs are ineffective rather than toxic, and patients still die needlessly from a disease
that modern medicine could cure or control because they are taking counterfeits unknowingly. There are no easy answers but
there are more things that we could do to help. We need to help these countries to build regulatory capacity, invest in monitoring
equipment, educate and involve the end user in the verification process.
Stobie: The problem seems to becoming more prevalent because anticipating where counterfeiting will hit, both geographically and
in terms of brand and medicine area, adds to the difficulty. Some have the view that big pharmaceutical companies are more
concerned with developing new products and dealing with regulatory issues, and thus, their supply chains are being overlooked.
The struggle to encourage a balanced investment in both drug development and supply-chain management can also escalate the
problem of counterfeiting.
PharmTech: The globalisation of pharmaceutical supply and manufacturing has contributed to the rise in counterfeit medicines. What
are some best practices that the industry can apply to secure their supply chains, especially for products coming from emerging
markets such as China and India?
Davison: The key is to examine processes first and then look at security technologies. At Blue Sphere, we use a simple mnemonic called
DRASTIC: Define goals, do a Reality check, collate and Analyse data, draw up a Strategy, develop Tactics, plan Implementation,
ensure Communication. Many companies make the mistake of jumping to tactics and then getting hung up on technology choice
and pack features. Technology bolted on to insecure processes does not add anything except cost. Look at all of your supply
chain processes from a counterfeiter’s viewpoint. The right question is not ‘could a criminal copy what we do?’ but ‘could
they disrupt, negate, or subvert our processes so that counterfeiting is made possible?’ As a minimum, you should audit all
your suppliers for their security processes, as well as the usual product quality parameters. When you are ready to add security
features, there are often many free or low cost approaches that you can take. Seek advice and always have a backup plan. Even
the best security approaches will eventually be compromised so planned upgrades are a good idea.
Stobie: There are several practices the industry can apply to secure its supply chains. The key ones are: