Target Selection and Qualification: The Case of Blister-Filling and Packaging Systems - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Target Selection and Qualification: The Case of Blister-Filling and Packaging Systems
The authors propose an approach for qualification-target selection and show how it can be applied to blister-filling and packaging systems.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 33, Issue 1, pp. 72-80

Regulations that control the construction of facilities and equipment for medical-product manufacturing require qualification of the facilities and equipment. The International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use defines the common principles of the qualification of ingredients, formulations, and packaging (1). However, it does not clearly define the methods for determining what must be qualified or for performing qualification.

In its guideline on commissioning and qualification (C&Q), the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE) states that qualification practices are required after commissioning to provide supplementary assurance that good engineering practices (GEP) have been followed (2).

ISPE says that a system-impact assessment should be performed first to identify the systems that have a direct effect on the quality of the product. The components or devices of the direct-impact systems should then be classified as critical components, which have a direct effect on the quality of the product, and noncritical components, which do not. Qualification practices should only be applied to the critical components. Adherence to GEP is sufficient for indirect-impact systems and noncritical components.

ISPE's C&Q document, however, mentions an exceptionally broad range of criteria for identifying critical components. The document does not describe in detail how to determine which critical components must be qualified or how to qualify them. For these reasons, various methods for selecting targets and performing qualification have emerged. In many cases, components are qualified even when they are not required to be.

The Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Committee of the Japan Society of Pharmaceutical Machinery and Engineering has studied qualification practices for systems used in solid-dosage-form facilities, including pan-coating systems, blister-filling and packaging systems, and pillow-packaging systems (3, 4). On the basis of these studies, this article proposes a new approach to target selection and qualification and shows how the approach can be applied to blister-filling and packaging systems.

Selecting the targets of qualification

ICH's Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients states that appropriate qualification of critical equipment and ancillary systems should be completed before starting process-validation activities. This section will explain which components of the critical equipment and ancillary systems should be selected as targets of qualification.

Medical-product manufacturing systems have various functions that are performed by the systems' mechanism, shape, and material. Using a certain system to manufacture medical products entails executing the system's functions under prescribed, controlled conditions. In ordinary manufacturing processes, some system functions have a direct effect on the quality of the products and others have an indirect effect.

The authors believe that qualification of critical equipment and ancillary systems should be interpreted as qualification of system functions that have a direct effect on product quality. The article will apply this principle to qualification-target selection, using blister-filling and packaging systems as an example. First, the quality of the products should be explained. The quality of blister products can be defined in terms of protecting their contents (e.g., tablets) and display or identification. This article focuses on the former function. The authors define the thickness of the blister pocket web as a critical factor that directly affects product protection.

Blister-filling and packaging systems are direct-impact systems because they directly affect the quality of blister-package products. An examination of the systems' operating principles shows that the forming function and the speed-control function directly affect the thickness of the blister pocket web. Furthermore, a close examination of the system devices that affect the forming function shows that the heating device and the forming device directly affect the thickness of the blister pocket web.

Parts of the heating and the forming devices directly affect web thickness, and the functions of these critical parts should be identified. For example, manufacturers should determine the function of the heating device's heating plate and that of the forming device's forming die. In this case, the required function is that of assigning the appropriate quantity of heat or shape and size to the plastic film. Because the quantity of heat is usually difficult to measure or control, however, the temperature of the heating plate should be measured and controlled instead.

The temperature of the heating plate and the shape and size of the forming die are called direct factors. Qualification should be restricted to these direct factors.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
19%
To all process for new products only
14%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
19%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
Overcoming the Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Stability Testing
PhRMA Dismayed by Special 301 Report
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here