Report from Brazil - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Report from Brazil
Prior to price escalation of pharmaceutical products in Brazil, the country's regulatory authority released a study on price-cap control and its benefits in the past years.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 37, Issue 5, pp. 34, 68


FLAVIO CONCEIÇÃO FOTOS/FLICKR/GETTY IMAGES
Brazil's regulatory chamber of pharmaceutical products market (Anvisa-CMED) has authorized pharmaceutical products in the country to have prices adjusted by up to 6.31% starting on March 31, 2013, according to Anvisa, an agency that monitors drug prices and gives technical support for the definition of drug prices. One of the agency's attributions is the Executive Secretariat of the Drug Market Regulation Chamber (CMED), which is an interministerial body responsible for drug market regulation and for establishing criteria of drug prices definition and their adjustments.

Anvisa, led by the Ministry of Health, has set percentages for raising the price of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents, diuretics, and other drugs. Homeopathic and naturopathic products are not subject to such price increase. The cap-price determined will be frozen either for a one-year period or until March 2014. According to the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Wholesalers Association (Abafarma), the percentages vary between 2.70%, 4.59%, and 6.31%, and were stipulated based on the market share of each product in the local market in comparison with generic brands of the same drug. As Abafarma executives note, the only products in Brazil to have price controls are pharmaceutical drugs.

Price-cap regulation

Since 2003, Anvisa's regulatory chamber has managed price controls of pharmaceutical drugs commercialized in Brazil by setting price-cap standards. The "production" price-cap defines the maximum wholesale price at which a pharmaceutical drug may be sold in the Brazilian market, while the "consumer" price-cap is the maximum price at which it can be sold to the customer at drugstores and pharmacies around the country.

The regulatory authority defines the maximum price of pharmaceutical drugs through CMED's Resolution 2/2004. New drugs entering the market will be put in categories and priced according to their use and scientific evidence according to the regulatory authority. When considering the price-cap for new pharmaceutical products, the local authority will also evaluate the lowest international price for that product using certain countries as a parameter, including the country where the drug was produced, as well others such as the United States, Canada, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece, France, Australia, and New Zealand.

Control benefits

The study, released in January 2013 by Anvisa, analyzed pricing standards in the past years and concluded that the current pricing regulation has enabled Brazilians to purchase pharmaceutical drugs at prices that are on average 35% lower than the values initially requested by the pharmaceutical industry. The study analyzed cap-prices established by CMED between March 2004 and December 2011 for 1115 formulae/presentations and 433 pharmaceutical drugs.

According to the management of Anvisa, the prices of pharmaceutical drugs entering the Brazilian market ended up lower than those presented to Anvisa by pharmaceutical companies because of the established price-cap market regulation, which impeded companies from charging higher values. The study evaluated the prices of pharmaceutical products containing new molecules, drugs to be sold in new pharmaceutical forms, and new associations for known active ingredients. The study showed that new associations of active

ingredients already existing in the country and drugs in new pharmaceutical forms (category V) had a difference of 38% between the final price and the price requested by the industry. Other pharmaceutical products that could not be included in any category established by the government had their prices "reduced" by an average of 35% and 45%.

For products carrying innovative molecules patented in Brazil and those that have been proven to offer therapeutic benefits compared with drugs already being applied for the same use (category I), the study showed that the final cap-price was on average 19% lower than the value requested by the pharmaceutical industry, Anvisa stated. Other new products that were not patented in the country, or that had not been proven to offer therapeutic benefits (category II), had a reduction of 37% on average compared with the original price suggested.

Study details

Of all the pharmaceutical drugs studied, 45.03% were category II products. New associations of active ingredients already existing in the country and drugs in new pharmaceutical forms (category V) made up 36.72% of all products analyzed. Drugs carrying innovative molecules patented in Brazil and that have been proven to offer therapeutic benefits compared with drugs already being applied for the same use totaled to only 3.24% of all drugs studied. The other "unclassified" categories totaled to 15.01%, according to Anvisa. A relevant aspect of the study was on the number of foreign companies and Brazilian firms that were granted pharmaceutical authorizations by Anvisa for drugs carrying new molecules. According to data from the study, foreign capital firms represented nearly 82% of the total number of companies that had authorizations issued under categories I or II. However, the study showed that there were no domestic companies offering pharmaceutical drugs under category I.

Anvisa's original study is available at http://s.anvisa.gov.br/wps/s/r/b3ZE|~http://s.anvisa.gov.br/wps/s/r/b3ZE/ .

Hellen Berger is a business writer based in São Paulo, Brazil.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
23%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
14%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
7%
All of the above.
47%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
9%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerOutside Looking In
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAdvances in Large-Scale Heterocyclic Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler New Era for Generic Drugs
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoTackling Drug Shortages
New Congress to Tackle Health Reform, Biomedical Innovation, Tax Policy
Combination Products Challenge Biopharma Manufacturers
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here