Using a Gravimetric Feeder to Dose Pharmaceutical Bulk Solids - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Using a Gravimetric Feeder to Dose Pharmaceutical Bulk Solids
Loss-in-weight feeders provide high accuracy for batch or continuous processes.

Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 37, Issue 5, pp. 50-52

Bulk-solids feeders are devices that meter the flow of bulk solids (e.g., powders) from a source (e.g., storage hoppers and intermediate bulk containers) to the downstream process at a precise flow rate. The optimal feeder depends on the powder's flow characteristics as well as the precision and throughput needed. In the pharmaceutical industry, single or twin-screw, volumetric or gravimetric feeders are commonly used to meter powders in various processes, such as milling, granulation, coating, direct compression, and blending. Pharmaceutical Technology spoke to Sharon Nowak, global business development manager for food and pharmaceutical, K-Tron, to find out more about how gravimetric, loss-in-weight feeders can be used in pharmaceutical bulk-solids processing, including their use in continuous-manufacturing processes.

Comparing volumetric and gravimetric feeders

PharmTech: How do volumetric and gravimetric feeders differ?

Nowak: Volumetric feeders control flow by metering a constant volume per time by regulating the speed of the feeding device. In the case of screw feeders, for example, this control would include setting the screw speed. The required speed is calibrated by weighing a timed sample. It should be noted that although there is no feedback to ensure feeding accuracy over time, this function may not be a concern for certain applications or materials with consistent bulk density. For this reason, volumetric feeders can be an economical choice for free-flowing materials and batch processes that require a lower degree of accuracy.

Gravimetric feeders, on the other hand, are real-time devices that meter the rate at a constant weight per unit of time. Weight is measured using a load cell; a feedback loop regulates the speed of the feeding device to control the feeder's accuracy. Gravimetric feeders as provided by K-Tron, for example, provide a much higher degree of accuracy, typically in the range of 0.25–0.5% of the required massflow setpoint.

How a gravimetric feeder operates

PharmTech: Can you explain further how a gravimetric feeder works?


Figure 1: A loss-in-weight gravimetric feeder uses load cells to continuously weigh the system. FIGURES COURTESY OF K-TRON
Nowak: The most popular type of gravimetric feeder used in continuous processes is the loss-in-weight feeder (see Figure 1). Loss-in-weight feeders directly measure and control the process variable of flow rate and can fully contain the material within the confines of the feeder. Loss-in-weight feeders are typically either mounted on weigh scales or suspended from load cells. The K-Tron load cell, for example, is designed specifically for the rate and accuracy requirements of dynamic feeding and includes a resolution as high as 1:4,000,000.

A loss-in-weight feeder consists of a hopper and feeder that are isolated from the process, so the entire system can be continuously weighed. As the feeder discharges material, system weight declines. The speed of the metering device is controlled to result in a per-unit-time loss of system weight equal to the desired feed rate. A typical loss-in-weight feeder controller adjusts feeder speed to produce a rate of weight loss equal to the desired feed-rate setpoint.

Any changes in material bulk density are sensed and accounted for by a change in metering speed. Precision, digital load cells from K-Tron, for example, use vibrating-wire weighing technology and digital filtering to discriminate between weight data and environmental effects, such as temperature, ambient vibration, and shock (Smart Force Transducer, K-Tron).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
29%
Breakthrough designations
10%
Protecting the supply chain
43%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
10%
More stakeholder involvement
10%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
Sandoz Wins Biosimilar Filing Race
NIH Translational Research Partnership Yields Promising Therapy
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here