21 CFR 11 Overview of the Final Document and its New Scope Ludwig Huber - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

21 CFR 11 Overview of the Final Document and its New Scope
Ludwig Huber
This article provides an overview of Rule 21 CFR Part 11's key requirements and its new, narrower scope.


Pharmaceutical Technology


For example, the regulation, earlier draft guidance documents, and early interpretations from FDA defined an electronic record as, "any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system" (1, Par. 11.1 [b]). But, the rule makes no distinction among the types of records or their criticality.

FDA requested Part 11 compliance for all such records that were generated or stored on a computer and could ask for such records at inspections. With this very broad interpretation, full implementation was very expensive and for some applications, it was impractical. In some cases, companies decided to keep paper records because of the anticipated additional complexity and cost involved with implementing the technical control required by the rule. This outcome clearly was not the original intent and spirit of the rule which was issued to protect public health and enable new technology to be used.

With the release of the draft guidance on scope and application of Part 11 in Feb. 2003 (5), FDA promoted a new, narrower approach. With the final guidance released on Sept. 3, 2003 and FDA's announcement to reexamine Part 11 and initiate a new rule-making process, this narrower approach became official and probably will be the basis for an updated regulation in the future.

The guidance states that Part 11 applies when:
  • the record is required by a predicate rule (e.g., electronic batch records for 21 CFR Part 211 and electronic training records in 21 CFR Part 58);
  • the electronic records are used to demonstrate compliance with a predicate rule (e.g., electronic training records for compliance with 21 CFR Part 211).

Part 11 applies in one or both of the following situations:

  • when electronic records are used instead of paper;
  • when persons make printouts but still rely on the electronic records to perform regulated activities.


Figure 1: Steps to determine whether records are within the scope of Part 11 (7).
Figure 1 illustrates the decision flow to determine which records fall under the scope of Part 11. This figure has been presented several times by FDA staff Part 11 experts. First, we check if the record is required by and can demonstrate compliance with the predicate rule.

Next, we determine if the record fits in the new, more-specific scope of Part 11. The main criterion is whether the record is maintained in electronic format in place of a paper format or in both electronic and paper formats, and whether people rely on the electronic records to perform regulated activities. A regulated activity is any activity required by an FDA regulation. For example, analytical test results must be recorded according to FDA's 21 CFR Part 211. In this case, the regulated activity is not limited to signing the record (e.g., a paper printout of an electronic record). It also includes all steps from data acquisition and evaluation.

Finally, we make a risk assessment of the criticality of the records and document the result. Based on the outcome, appropriate Part 11 controls are implemented.

The final criteria is to evaluate the risk the record has on product quality and data integrity. Examples of high-risk records are electronic batch records and analytical records of final product testing. Errors at this stage will not be identified and cannot be recovered before the product ships to the market. An example of low-risk records are electronic planning documents such as cleaning or maintenance schedules. Electronic standard operating procedures could fall into the medium- or low-risk category, depending on the procedure's effect on product quality. The International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering has published a list of such risk classifications (6).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
23%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
14%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
7%
All of the above.
47%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
9%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerOutside Looking In
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerAdvances in Large-Scale Heterocyclic Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler New Era for Generic Drugs
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoTackling Drug Shortages
New Congress to Tackle Health Reform, Biomedical Innovation, Tax Policy
Combination Products Challenge Biopharma Manufacturers
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here