Warning Letter: Ranbaxy Cited for CGMPs Deviations - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Warning Letter: Ranbaxy Cited for CGMPs Deviations


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

ranbaxy On June 15, 2006, the US Food and Drug Evaluation's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (Rockville, MD, www.fda.gov) issued a 7-page warning letter to Ranbaxy Laboratories (Himachal Pradesh, India, www.ranbaxy.com) for violations to US current good manufacturing practices (CGMPs).

Investigators found "significant deviations" to CGMP regulations during a Feb. 20-25 inspection of the company's pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in Paonta Sahib, India. Ranbaxy issued three responses (March 20, April 20, May 25) to the observations noted in an Inspectional Observations (FDA 483) form at the end of the inspection, but FDA still has several concerns:

  • Laboratory records did not include complete records of operating conditions and settings used for analysis or raw stability data acquired during drug product and lot testing (21 CFR 211.194[a][4]).
  • Ranbaxy did not establish and follow a written stability testing program to assess drug product stability and to determine storage conditions and expiration dates. Stability sample test intervals were undocumented (21 CFR 211.166[a][1]) and storage conditions were not adequately documented (21 CFR 211.166[a][2]).
  • The quality control unit does not have the personnel and the equipment to conduct proper drug stability testing (21 CFR 211.22.[b]).

FDA said in its letter, "Until FDA has confirmed correction of the deficiencies observed during the most recent inspection and compliance with CGMPs, this office will recommend withholding approval of any new applications listing your Paonta Sahib facility as the manufacturer of finished pharmaceutical drug products."


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
20%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
24%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
20%
Do not use QbD
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here