Preparation and Characterization of Meloxicam–Myrj-52 Granules Obtained by Melt Granulation - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Preparation and Characterization of Meloxicam–Myrj-52 Granules Obtained by Melt Granulation
Various manufacturing techniques can improve a drug's solubility, thus increasing its bioavailability. The authors examined whether melt granulation can enhance drug solubility using meloxicam as the drug substance and myrj-52 as the binder.


Pharmaceutical Technology


Preparation of the solid dispersion. The solid dispersion was prepared by fusion. First myrj-52 was melted and the mixture of drug and StarLac was added. The mixture was stirred for 5 min at 60 C and cooled on aluminum foil at room temperature. Next, the solid sample was pulverized in the mortar, sieved, and stored in the dessicator at 25 C.

Evaluation of melt granules, physical mixture, and solid dispersion

Drug content. The percentage of drug content in the granules and solid dispersion was measured by dissolving the amount of granules or solid dispersion equivalent to 15 mg of meloxicam in 100 mL of ethanol. The drug content in the solution was measured spectrophotometrically (UV-1700 UV–vis spectrophotometer, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 363.5 nm.

Solubility studies. Excess amounts of pure meloxicam were added to 30 mL of 0–10% concentrations of myrj-52 solution, sonicated, and agitated for 24 h. The suspension was filtered (0.45-μm filter, Millipore, Billerica, MA), diluted with the same concentration of myrj-52 solution, and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 363.5 nm. The average of three experiments was taken.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of samples were obtained, after appropriate background subtraction, using an FTIR spectrometer (8400 S, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate detector, a diffuse-reflectance accessory, and a data station. About 1–2 mg of the sample was mixed with dry potassium bromide. The sample was then scanned at the 400- and 4000-cm–1 wavelength ranges.

Differential scanning calorimetry. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 30, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH) was used to obtain the DSC curves representing the rates of heat uptake. About 3 mg of sample was weighed in a standard open aluminum pan. An empty pan of the same type was used as the reference. Samples were heated from 30 to 300 C at a heating rate of 20 C/min while being purged with dry nitrogen. Calibrations of temperature and heat flow were performed with indium.

Powder X-ray diffractometry. The solid dispersion, melt granulation, and physical mixture of meloxicam compared with the plain meloxicam were analyzed using a powder diffractometer (PW 1830, Phillips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Samples were exposed to CuKα radiation to measure the 2θ at 4–50 with a diffractometer reproducibility of 0.001. A rate meter with a time constant of 2 102 pulses/s and a scanning speed of 2 (2θ)/min recorded the PXRD patterns automatically.

Scanning electron microscopy. The samples were sputter-coated with gold to render them electrically conductive. The samples' morphology was examined using SEM (JEOL-840 SEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Granule-size analysis. The size distribution of granules was evaluated by sieve analysis with a vibrating shaker (Labhosp, Mumbai) and #5 sieve in the 75–1400 μm range. The fractions were collected, stored in a dessicator at 25 2 C, and used for the dissolution.

In vitro dissolution studies. The dissolution of meloxicam alone, from the melt granulation, from the physical mixture (PM), and from the solid dispersion (SD) were determined using a US Pharmacopeia (USP) Type II dissolution apparatus (Veego Scientific, Mumbai). The dissolution medium consisted of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) maintained at 37 0.5 C.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
29%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
10%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
6%
All of the above.
42%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
13%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here