The Disintegration and Dissolution of Nabumetone Dispersible Tablets - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

The Disintegration and Dissolution of Nabumetone Dispersible Tablets
Nabumetone was complexed with β-cyclodextrin, and a 23 factorial design was used to prepare dispersible tablets containing the drug or its complex.The authors analyzed the effects of complexation as well as the levels of ammonium bicarbonate and crospovidone on tablet wetting time (WT), disintegration time (DT), and percent dissolution efficiency at 60 min (%DE60).


Pharmaceutical Technology



Figure 5: Three-dimensional plots showing the effect of formulation variables on wetting time of tablets containing (a) nabumetone and (b) nabumetone b-cyclodextrin complex. All figures are courtesy of the authors.
Wetting time. WT of different model formulations ranged from 21.33 ± 1.78 s to 73.66 ± 3.22 s and depended on the levels of bicarbonate and crospovidone. The predictor equation generated for WT was significant, with an F value of 887.48 (p < 0.0001) and an R2 value of 0.999. The three-dimensional plots demonstrate the negative influence of the bicarbonate and crospovidone levels on WT (see Figure 5).

WT decreased from 67.33 ± 2.41 s to 43.00 ± 2.10 s and from 54.66 ± 2.15 s to 21.33 ± 1.78 s at lower and higher levels of crospovidone, respectively, as the levels of bicarbonate increased in tablets containing the drug (see Figure 5a). This result can be attributed to the fact that high subliming agent levels left the tablet porous, which made the water easily accessible to the disintegrant and caused rapid tablet wetting.

The plots also show that WT decreased from 67.33 ± 2.41 s to 54.66 ± 2.15 s and from 43.00 ± 2.10 s to 21.33 ± 1.78 s at lower and higher levels of bicarbonate, respectively, as the crospovidone increased. The effects of bicarbonate and crospovidone on WT were more evident at higher levels than at lower levels as demonstrated by the three-dimensional plot. This result could be attributed to a rapid water uptake by the super disintegrant at higher levels.

WT decreased from 73.66 ± 3.22 s to 48.33 ± 2.32 s and from 60.66 ± 3.41 to 25.00 ± 1.52 s at lower and higher levels of crospovidone, respectively, as the levels of bicarbonate increased in tablets containing the complex (see Figure 5b). The plot also shows that WT reduced from 73.66 ± 3.22 s to 60.66 ± 3.41 s and from 48.33 ± 2.32 s to 25.00 ± 1.52 s at lower and higher levels of bicarbonate, respectively, as the levels of crospovidone increased. In addition to the main effects, the interaction effect X1X2 also had a negative influence on WT.


Figure 6: Plots showing the effect of formulation variables on dissolution efficiency of tablets containing (a) nabumetone and (b) nabumetone b-cyclodextrin complex. All figures are courtesy of the authors.
Dissolution efficiency. DE at the end of 45 min (%DE45) of the tablets containing the drug varied from 37.93 ± 1.05 to 41.21 ± 0.71, whereas tablets containing the complex exhibited %DE45 ranging between 61.20 ± 1.84 and 66.50 ± 1.52. The linear model generated for %DE45 was significant with an F value of 408.05 (p < 0.0001) and R2 value of 0.9885. Complexation was the lone factor that significantly influenced %DE45. The lack of any significant influence of the levels of ammonium bicarbonate and crospovidone on %DE45 of the tablets was clearly demonstrated in the three-dimensional plots shown in Figure 6. Complexation of the drug with β-CD, which improved drug solubility, was the major contributing factor responsible for the enhanced dissolution rate and the value of %DE.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What is the single greatest threat to maintaining manufacturing processes at your facility?
Quality issues
Facility/environment problems
Process development problems
Production equipment downtime
Raw material supply problems
Regulatory restrictions
Business decisions to limit production
Quality issues
42%
Facility/environment problems
0%
Process development problems
8%
Production equipment downtime
8%
Raw material supply problems
25%
Regulatory restrictions
0%
Business decisions to limit production
17%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Patent Settlements Become More Risky
Praise and Perils for Biotechnology Patent Policy
Risk-Mitigation Strategies in Drug Manufacturing for Emerging Markets
Quality Focus: Ensuring Raw Material Transparency
Advertising of Prescription Drugs  Keeping it Honest and Balanced
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here