Measuring Excipient-Market Growth - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Measuring Excipient-Market Growth
Moderate growth is projected for the global excipients market. Excipient producers target blends and new grades for improving functionality and performance.


Pharmaceutical Technology


USP water. BCC Research classifies USP water as a general chemical in its analysis of the global excipient market. USP water includes water for injection (WFI) and purified water. Water must comply with USP standards for chemical purity and microbial content (i.e., < 0.25 ppm of endotoxins). WFI accounts for 76.5% of the USP water market, or $52 million, and purified water 23.5%, or $16 million (1).

Pharmaceutical grades of water used in drug-process applications (i.e., enema and medical-irrigating fluids) and other than those used to formulate excipients are excluded from the analysis. Also excluded is water used as: a pharmaceutical manufacturing process aid (i.e., wet granulation); a solvent for aqueous-based, film-coating materials; a cleaning and rinsing material for containers and closures; a fermentation or cell-culture media ingredient; an extraction and purification solvent; a chemical-reaction solvent; or any other purpose except in a formulated drug-dosage form.

Excipient innovation


Table II: Global excipients market by functional type (1).
Excipients serve various functions within a pharmaceutical formulation. Table II breaks down the global excipient market by functional type on a value and volume basis. An ongoing goal of excipient development is to achieve multifunctionality with a single or a reduced number of excipients in a formulation. Despite increased interest by pharmaceutical companies to add functionality, excipient producers say it is difficult to bring new excipients to market.

"As there is not an approval process for excipients, the introduction of new materials for use as excipients takes a very long time, and most suppliers are not willing to invest as the rewards do not justify the investment for a material new to the industry," explains Tim Bee, senior director of the global pharmaceuticals business at International Specialty Products (ISP, Wayne, NJ).

"The cost of new excipients in terms of the need for toxicology studies is prohibitive for most excipient companies," adds Alen Guy, vice-president of research and development at JRS Pharma (Patterson, NY). "The return on investment is not there, and such a venture needs a 'slam dunk' application to receive senior-level approval."

Wider options

Although introducing new excipients is a slow and costly process, the excipient market is not without innovation. Excipient makers use a strategy of developing excipient blends to achieve multifunctionality and introduce new grades of existing excipients to enhance performance for specified applications. Excipients for orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) and controlled-release formulations are recent examples.

Orally disintegrating tablets. In September 2007, BASF launched "Ludiflash," a coprocessed excipient consisting of three ingredients: a special grade of mannitol used as a filler; crospovidone used as a superdisintegrant; and a polyvinyl acetate dispersion used as a binder. Ludiflash was specifically developed for the manufacture of ODTs but can also be used as granules or powder in sachets. Because it contains a filler, binder, and disintegrant, only the API and a lubricant are added to the formulation. Colorants and taste-masking agents may also be used.

"Ludiflash offers properties not achievable by simply blending the three ingredients," explains Dr. Ralf Widmaier, marketing manager at BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany). "It offers a wide-processing window and very good hardness and low friability of the tablets at disintegration times within 10–30 s in the mouth without drinking water."


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What is the single greatest threat to maintaining manufacturing processes at your facility?
Quality issues
Facility/environment problems
Process development problems
Production equipment downtime
Raw material supply problems
Regulatory restrictions
Business decisions to limit production
Quality issues
44%
Facility/environment problems
0%
Process development problems
11%
Production equipment downtime
11%
Raw material supply problems
11%
Regulatory restrictions
0%
Business decisions to limit production
22%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Patent Settlements Become More Risky
Praise and Perils for Biotechnology Patent Policy
Risk-Mitigation Strategies in Drug Manufacturing for Emerging Markets
Quality Focus: Ensuring Raw Material Transparency
Advertising of Prescription Drugs  Keeping it Honest and Balanced
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here