Dimethyl Sulfoxide USP, PhEur in Approved Pharmaceutical Products and Medical Devices - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Dimethyl Sulfoxide USP, PhEur in Approved Pharmaceutical Products and Medical Devices
The authors survey the approved applications of dimethyl sulfoxide USP, PhEur across the healthcare industry and consider the suitability of DMSO from a regulatory and formulation compatibility standpoint.


Pharmaceutical Technology


The emergence of DMSO as a cryopreservation agent to preserve living cells and tissue dates back to the early 1960s (24). Dr. Stanley Jacob (an assistant professor of surgery at Oregon Health & Science University) became aware of this property and approached the Crown Zellerbach Corporation. Crown Zellerbach was considering potential commercial applications for the material, which was readily available from its paper–wood products businesses. Dr. Jacob went on to describe the use of DMSO to treat a number of human ailments, including wound treatment, arthritis, and pain relief. In 1964, Crown Zellerbach received IND status for DMSO and granted licenses to six major pharmaceutical companies in the US to develop pharmaceutical applications for DMSO. Among these were Merck and Co., American Home products, Squibb and Sons, Schering, and the Syntex Corp. (23).

Rubin's report in 1965 that DMSO could cause lenticular changes in certain laboratory animals caused FDA to temporarily halt clinical trials involving DMSO. FDA relaxed its ban the following year but limited research to certain untreatable conditions (such as scleroderma). Continued research into any ocular effects that DMSO might have on humans suggests that such damage is species dependent and is not seen in human subjects (24–26).

A groundswell of popular interest in the medicinal properties of DMSO arose in the late 1970s, and an effort to legitimize (and legalize) the use of DMSO in medical applications was pursued. In the early 1980s, the public perception that DMSO was being unfairly persecuted by FDA was aired in the popular press. The CBS television show "60 Minutes" presented a segment favorable to this idea (27) and Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) chaired a Senate Subcommittee meeting to examine the treatment of DMSO by FDA (22).

During the past two decades, it would seem that many concerns surrounding the safety of DMSO have largely subsided. A DMSO product suitable for use in humans and that is manufactured according to FDA requirements is available for regulated applications, and the products described previously are being marketed worldwide.

In addition, the case for DMSO as a panacea for an array of health problems also may be eroding. Although it is likely that DMSO has functionality in many therapy types, it is clear that much fervor has resulted from subjective evaluation and anecdotal experience. Many DMSO "wonder drug" claims have been evaluated in the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center's CIMER DMSO National Standard Patient Monograph (28).

The regulatory concerns governing DMSO use in regulated applications may be similarly subsiding. It seems likely that the public's excitement over DMSO had a significant impact on the early development of regulated pharmaceutical products that would benefit from its inclusion. One author makes the interesting point that FDA most strictly regulated DMSO research at the same time as the Kefauver–Harris amendment was being drafted in the US as a response to the Kevadon/thalidomide tragedy in the mid 1960s (22).

Toxicology and health effects


Table V: Toxicological overview of dimethyl sulfoxide (10).
The toxicology, pharmacology, and metabolic aspects of DMSO have been studied extensively (10, 29). Perhaps the most complete summary of acute/chronic toxicity data, ecotoxicity, and environmental pathway information is available as part of the high production volume (HPV) chemical filing on behalf of a Dimethyl Sulfoxide Manufacturing Consortium with the US Environmental Protection Agency (30). Based on the wealth of information available, it is a fair statement that DMSO possesses a low degree of toxicity to humans via oral and parenteral routes. DMSO is not carcinogenic and is not a reproductive toxin. It is worthwhile to point out that DMSO is used as the background solvent in biological assays of mutigenicity (Ames test). As such, it is widely recognized that DMSO is not a mutagen. Table V provides a thumbnail overview of toxicological indicators for DMSO.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
24%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
10%
All of the above.
44%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
10%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here