Manufacturing High-Potency Drugs Using Isolators - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Manufacturing High-Potency Drugs Using Isolators
The author discusses the key issues to consider when using isolators such as containment, protection of personnel, the efficiency of biodecontamination cycles, sterility assurance levels, barriers and their integrity, and environmental impact.


Pharmaceutical Technology


Conclusion

Isolators are the sole future of high-potency drug processing in the pharmaceutical industry. Isolators represent the only existing technology that guarantees the best protection for operators and the high sterility-assurance level of injectable products. The fully isolated system provides total containment for all material handling with the highest capital costs offset by lower operating cost.

Use of isolators has grown with the correspondent increase in the discovery and use of high-potency drugs. The industry is understanding the advantages of isolators even if regulations do not officially require their use. The isolator will be the only technology allowed by regulatory authorities for manufacturing high- potency drugs under safe conditions. The advantages offered by isolators compared with traditional cleanrooms is pushing the industry to choose isolator technology for future investments in high-potency manufacturing (1–10).

Maurizio Battistini is a general manager and the qualified person with Abraxis BioScience, via Cadepiano, 24–6917, Lugano Barbengo, Switzerland, tel. +41 91 9852640, Fax +41 91 9852641,
.

Note: A "qualified person" is a designation in European pharmaceutical regulations (Article, 51 EU Directive 2001/83/EC for Medicinal Products for Human Use).

References

1. FDA, Guidance for Industry—Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing—Current Good Manufacturing Practice Appendix 1: Aseptic Processing Isolators (Rockville, MD), Sept. 2004, available at http://www.fda.gov/CbER/gdlns/steraseptic.pdf, accessed Oct. 13, 2008.

2. FDA, Pharmaceutical CGMPS for the 21st Century—A Risk-based Approach (Rockville, MD), available at http://www.fda.gov/Cder/gmp2004/GMP_finalreport2004.htm, accessed Oct. 13, 2008.

3. J. Lysford and M. Porter, "Barrier Isolation History and Trends," presented at the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering Washington Conference: Barrier Isolation Technology, Washington DC, June 2004.

4. ISO, ISO 14644-7 Cleanrooms and Associated Controlled Environments: Part Z: Separative Devices (Clean Air Hoods, Gloveboxes, Isolators and Mini Environments) (Geneva, Switzerland) Oct. 2004.

5. PDA, Technical Report No. 34 Design and Validation Of Isolator System for Manufacturing and Testing of Health Care Products, June 2001.

6. PIC/S, PI 014-1: Recommendation—Isolator Used for Aseptic Processing and Sterility Testing (Geneva, Switzerland), June 2002.

7. EUDRA, EU GMP: Eudra I: Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use: Good Manufacturing Practices Vol. 4, Annex 1, p. 66.

8. "FDA Q&A on Barrier Isolation—The FDA Answers Your Questions on Barrier Isolator Technology," Pharm. Eng. 27 (2), 2007.

9. L. Francis, "Containment Considerations for Toxic and Potent Aseptic Liquid Filling," Pharm. Eng. 27 (3), 2007.

10. J. Agalloco, J. Akers, and R. Madsen, "Choosing Technologies for Aseptic Filling: Back to the Future, Forward to the Past, Pharm. Eng, 27 (1), 2007.

For a comparison of conventional cleanrooms, restricted access barrier systems, and isolators, see the online exclusive, "A Comparison of Conventional Cleanrooms, Restricted Access Barrier Systems and Isolators".


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here