Reader Comments on "A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Industries" - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Reader Comments on "A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Industries"


The comment below is in response to Editor-in-Chief Michelle Hoffman's December 2008 editorial, “A Tale of Two Pharmacetuical Industries.”

Reader H.Y. Guh writes:

Your recent article in Pharmaceutical Technology about two pharmaceutical industries, one for export and one for the domestic, in China is absolutely correct. Having been consulting in China over the past 7 years, however, I am in disagreement on the regulations by the Chinese government.
 
The State Drug and Food Administration (SFDA), a government agency in Beijing, regulates the pharmaceutical industry in a way similar to that of the FDA. As a matter of fact, the SFDA has literally copied  US GMP practices and regulations for its use.
 
The sad part is inadequate enforcement due to rampant corruptions at all levels of the agency. During visits to my clients, I have observed personally how an inspection was conducted and managed. Furthermore, the market place is chaotic, “anything goes”, and full of bribery and kickbacks. Hospitals and medical professionals rely heavily on the “gray” drug income to maintain services and livelihood. For instance, a skilled surgeon makes a meager salary of about 3,000 Yuan (or US$450) a month, less than a college graduate of 2-3 year experience. The thin profit margins have made it economically impossible for pharmaceutical companies to follow GMP. For overseas markets of good margins, Chinese firms can afford to meet GMP requirements acceptable to the FDA or other foreign agencies.
 
As an overseas Chinese, I feel horrible about the poor pharmaceutical quality that Chinese people are getting. From a pragmatic standpoint, China lacks resources to manage all of its needs demanded by 1.3 billion citizens. Its leaders have to make tough choices. Drug quality unfortunately commands less priority when compared to food safety.
 
On the positive side, China is rapidly evolving and is moving toward an open society day by day. I hope in the not too distant future, the SFDA would attain adequate funding, strengthen enforcement and do away with the 2-tier system.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
28%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
9%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
9%
All of the above.
41%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
13%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?

Click here