Targeting Spending and Innovation Levels: Annual Equipment and Machinery Survey - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Targeting Spending and Innovation Levels: Annual Equipment and Machinery Survey
Pharmaceutical Technology's annual survey on equipment and machinery shows fewer companies increased spending in 2008 and still fewer will increase spending in 2009 as overall economic conditions affects purchasing decisions.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 33, Issue 3, pp. 60-70

Process analytical technology


Figure 6 Does your company incorporate process analytical technology (PAT) into your manufacturing line?
The survey also examined the importance of PAT in the manufacturing activities of respondents. More than half (56%) said that their companies do not incorporate PAT into their manufacturing lines, and nearly 44% do (see Figure 6).

Innovator drug companies lead in PAT implementation. Approximately 55% of innovator pharmaceutical firms said they have incorporated PAT into their manufacturing lines, and roughly 49% of biotechnology companies and 46% of consumer healthcare companies have. Thirty-two percent of generic-drug companies and 23% of contract manufacturers have implemented PAT.

Among respondents whose companies use PAT in their manufacturing lines, the most common benefits PAT has brought to their production process are better process understanding (71% said so) and increased efficiency or reduced waste (57%). For those companies not using PAT, the most common reason why they do not use it is that the benefits do not justify the necessary effort (49% said so) and that it is expensive (31%).

Stainless steel versus disposables


Figure 7 Does your company use disposables or single-use components in your biopharmaceutical manufacturing?
The survey also examined the spending and interest in the use of disposables or single-use components in biopharmaceutical manufacturing compared with stainless-steel systems. More than half (55%) of respondents said their companies used disposables or single-use components in their biopharmaceutical manufacturing (see Figure 7). The penetration of disposables use was greatest among biotechnology companies (87% of biotechnology companies use disposables), followed by innovator pharmaceutical companies (62%), contract manufacturers (46%), consumer healthcare companies (18%), and generic-drug companies (15%).


Figure 8 For future purchases of bioreactors, are you more inclined to purchase
Although more than a majority of companies use disposables, 44% were undecided whether they would buy a single-use or stainless- steel bioreactor for future purchases (see Figure 8). Only 6% said that they had a preference for purchasing single-use bioreactors and nearly 18% had a preference for stainless-steel bioreactors (see Figure 8).

Gauging innovation


Respondents profile
Disposables or single-use components and equipment for biologic-based APIs were high on the innovation curve. Thirty percent of respondents rated product innovation high for disposables or single-use components in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, and 22% ranked innovation in equipment for manufacturing biologic-based APIs as high. Also receiving strong marks for innovation were laboratory equipment (23% of respondents ranked it as high) and machinery for quality assurance and quality control (17%).

Innovation is significant when making a purchasing decision. Fifty-eight percent of respondents said innovation was "extremely" or "very" important in influencing their decision to buy equipment and machinery. Respondents also said that they were generally satisfied with the level of product innovation in 2008. Eighty-two percent of respondents said there were not new product innovations that they had anticipated for 2008 but were not commercialized. Seventy-two percent said there were not innovations in existing equipment that they had hoped for, but were not made.

Reference

1. P. Van Arnum, "Pharmaceutical Technology's Equipment and Machinery Trends Survey," Pharm. Technol. 32 (3), 64–70 (2008).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
27%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
12%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Seven Steps to Solving Tabletting and Tooling ProblemsStep 1: Clean
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here