Extending Calibrations for Near Infrared Assay of Tablets Using Synthetic Modeling and Variance from Placebos - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Extending Calibrations for Near Infrared Assay of Tablets Using Synthetic Modeling and Variance from Placebos
The authors extend the range of a near-infrared calibration model for tablet assay using production 'seed' spectra and synthetic spectra generated from placebos and 'pure' active pharmaceutical ingredient spectra.

Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 33, Issue 3, pp. 120-124

Figure 8
Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to develop the prediction model. PLS uses principal component analysis and is a variation of principle component regression (PCR). The correct number of principal components or factors determination is aided by the Vision software supplied with the instrument by calculating where the predicted residual error sum of squares (PRESS) reaches a minimum (3). Although the PRESS does not reach a minimum until 13 factors, 6 were chosen as optimal allowing more than 10 calibration samples for each factor and considering possible degrees of freedom.

Figure 9
Figure 6 is a plot of the principal component loadings around the 1138-nm absorption band for CPM. The loadings appear spectra-like and are not noisy, indicating good modeling attributes for the factors chosen. The loading indicate regions of high correlated variance throughout the spectrum for each factor. Figure 7 is a plot of the PRESS. The model chosen used only six of these factors, trading decreased error for robustness (4). The PRESS for six factors was 0.0012. The resulting model had a multiple correlation coefficient (R 2) value of 0.9987 and a standard error of calibration (SEC) of 0.0037 mg. The one-left-out cross validation demonstrates good predictability with a standard error of cross validation of 0.004 mg (very close to the SEC).

Table II: Predicted values for the validation set with nominal value of 1.0 mg.
Figure 8 shows the NIR predicted CPM concentrations versus the HPLC results for each tablet in the calibration set using the synthetic calibration equation CPMsyncal2. The other five tablets scanned (tablet 6a through tablet 10a) on the MasterLab instrument with nominal levels of 1.0 mg CPM, that were not in the calibration set, were predicted for validation. Figure 9 shows the NIR predictions of the validation set versus the Lab (HPLC) CPM value. Table II shows the predicted values for the validation set. The standard error of prediction (SEP) of the validation set compared with the HPLC data was 0.0104 mg and the bias was 0.0139 mg. The SEP is significantly larger then the SEC because the synthetic calibration samples have reduced error except for the "seed" samples. The SEP is low at only about 1% of batch label claim.


The authors demonstrated a method for generating a prediction model from placebo and "seed" batch samples from the production line with synthetic samples generated from average placebo and batch samples to increase the sample range. A prediction model with an R 2 value of 0.9987 and a standard error of calibration (SEC) value of 0.0037 mg was developed. The standard error of prediction (SEP) on the validation set was only 1% of label claim at 0.0104 mg.


Thanks to Om Anand, Maria Gerald Rajan, Namrata R. Trivedi, Wen Qu, Yingxu Peng, and Yichun Sun who were at the University of Tennessee, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, at the time the CPM tablets were made and analyzed with HPLC.

Robert Mattes* is an applications scientist and Denise Root is a product manager, both at FOSS NIRSystems,

*To whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Submitted: July 14, 2008. Accepted: Aug. 12, 2008.

What would you do differently? Submit your comments about this paper in the space below.


1. FDA, Guidance for Industry: PAT-A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance (September, 2004, Rockville, MD).

2. R.A. Mattes et al., "Near-Infrared Assay and Content Uniformity of Tablets," Pharm. Technol. 31 (4), 170–182 2007.

3. R. Kramer, Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis (Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1998).

4. K.R. Beebe, R.J. Pell, and M.B. Seasholtz, Chemometrics: A Practical Guide (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
| Weekly

Which of the following business challenge poses the greatest threat to your company?
Building a sustainable pipeline of products
Attracting a skilled workforce
Obtaining/maintaining adequate financing
Regulatory compliance
Building a sustainable pipeline of products
Attracting a skilled workforce
Obtaining/maintaining adequate financing
Regulatory compliance
View Results
Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerBiopharma Outsourcing Activities Update
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia Challener, PhDAppropriate Process Design Critical for Commercial Manufacture of Highly Potent APIs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler FDA and Manufacturers Seek a More Secure Drug Supply Chain
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatcchSean MilmoQuality by Design?Bridging the Gap between Concept and Implementation
Medicare Payment Data Raises Questions About Drug Costs
FDA Wants You!
A New Strategy to Tackle Antibiotic Resistance
Drug-Diagnostic Development Stymied by Payer Concerns
Obama Administration Halts Attack on Medicare Drug Plans
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here