Quality by Design: Adding Another Dimension to Outsourcing - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Quality by Design: Adding Another Dimension to Outsourcing
FDA's quality-by-design initiative is gradually reshaping the paradigm for pharmaceutical manufacturing and the opportunities and challenges in outsourcing.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 34, Issue 1, pp. 40-44

Other contract manufacturers further point to the deepening of the outsourced relationship. "QbD helps inform API selection, drug formulation, and manufacturing processes upfront, potentially resulting in better, more optimized drug design," says Jan-Olav Henck, senior director of scientific operations at Aptuit (Greenwich, CT), a contract manufacturer of APIs and finished drug products and a provider of formulation-development services. "Rather than changing the relationship between sponsor companies and their outsourcing partner, QbD aligns well with outsourcing relationships based on scientific expertise that generates high-quality data that can then be strategically applied to the drug-development process."

As an example, Aptuit recently developed a solid-state chemistry production screen. "The production screen applies the practical application of advanced theoretical developments to increase our understanding of APIs and drug formulations," says Henck. "We're able to characterize the proclivity to change a compound when introducing mechanical pressures, and we apply that information to contribute to the development of safe and effective drugs by enabling reproducible and predictable performance at critical interfaces in the drug-development process."

Ash Stevens (Detroit, MI), a contract manufacturer of APIs, also points to how its approach is aligned with QbD. "After the basic process is identified, we can perform parametric studies to identify or confirm the critical process parameters," says Gary A. Baker, vice-president of quality assurance and regulatory affairs for Ash Stevens. "We can use the information obtained to perform process optimization. We can then perform one final set of experiments to challenge the process to demonstrate that purity and quality will be maintained at the extremes of the critical parametric ranges. When the process transfers to manufacturing, we continue to build a lot history to keep the process under control. We can insert 'alert-limits' and 'action-limits,' tighter than those limits in the regulatory filing, to make us aware of undesirable trends."

Others point to the value of QbD. "QbD encourages use of in-process controls to reduce risk," says Carl I. Oberg, president of Pharma Tech Industries (PTI, Royston, GA), a contract provider of manufacturing and packaging services for prescription and over-the-counter drugs. As a contract manufacturer, PTI already uses in-process testing as a control mechanism to ensure quality products prior to quality-assurance release testing and to reduce the risk of further stage processing of materials that may be compromised. However, we are seeing more customers willing to entertain the idea of in-process testing and statistical process control to ensure the lot being produced is of the optimal quality throughout the lot."

Risk mitigation is one benefit of in-process testing and provides a business case for QbD. "Incorporating more in-process control mechanisms that give real-time feedback should reduce risks," says Oberg. "In-process controls not only ensure a quality product, but also reduce financial risk associated with high-cost excipients and active pharmaceutical ingredients. We do see the pharmaceutical industry evolving into this approach and feel that contract manufacturers will need to participate in order to assess the best approach for process monitoring and correct sample sizes. This approach is not only good for the quality of the product; it is also good business sense."

Read another perspective on ICH Q10 from FDA's Grace McNally.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
28%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
11%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
9%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
7%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here