Surface Plasmon Resonance as an Analytical Tool for Bioprocessing - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Surface Plasmon Resonance as an Analytical Tool for Bioprocessing
A Q&A with GE Healthcare


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 34, pp. s2-s3

PharmTech: What are the advantages of SPR over existing analytic technologies?

Sundberg: Because SPR detects binding in real time, and sample prep is minimal, there's a tremendous time-saving over, say, ELISA or high-performance liquid chromatograhy. Variability is low, and the coefficient of variability often falls in the range of 1–5%, even for very crude samples (e.g., cell-culture supernatants). Apart from the improved productivity, SPR also resolves affinity into its kinetic parameters (on-and off-rates) which enables scientists to assess more clinically relevant parameters such as recognition and stability of binding to target-binding site.

PharmTech: Could you give us an idea of what sort of time saving you're talking about?

Sundberg: You would get an answer from an ELISA assay in a matter of hours, but SPR could give you an answer within a few minutes (3–10 minutes). For process engineers, this can shave considerable time off process development. Also, unlike HPLC, SPR does not require you to produce a standard curve, so that essentially SPR enables calibration-free concentration analysis. This is of great advantage when you have an unstable standard, or if a standard is not available.

PharmTech: What is the future potential of SPR as a PAT tool?

Sundberg: The real-time capability and critical information from SPR would provide a great advantage in PAT applications in the future. On-line or in-line detection of product with SPR would provide critical information of quality attributes and how these are affected by process modifications. For example, there have been some academic initiatives that have proven the possibility of connecting Biacore to bioreactors for continuous monitoring of expression levels over time under various conditions.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
What role should the US government play in the current Ebola outbreak?
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
Provide treatment for patients globally.
All of the above.
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
Finance development of drugs to treat/prevent disease.
28%
Oversee medical treatment of patients in the US.
10%
Provide treatment for patients globally.
8%
All of the above.
46%
No government involvement in patient treatment or drug development.
8%
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim MillerCMO Industry Thins Out
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerFluorination Remains Key Challenge in API Synthesis
Marilyn E. Morris Guest EditorialMarilyn E. MorrisBolstering Graduate Education and Research Programs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Biopharma Manufacturers Respond to Ebola Crisis
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoHarmonizing Marketing Approval of Generic Drugs in Europe
Legislators Urge Added Incentives for Ebola Drug Development
FDA Reorganization to Promote Drug Quality
FDA Readies Quality Metrics Measures
New FDA Team to Spur Modern Drug Manufacturing
From Generics to Supergenerics
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here