Report from Brazil - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Report from Brazil
A look at why Brazil revised its GMP standards and how the changes will affect the local pharmaceutical industry.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 34, Issue 9, pp. 18, 20

Local impact

"The main changes [to RDC 17] regard the need to 'Validate Computerized Systems' related with the process of production of pharmaceutical drugs," says Henrique Tada, technical regulatory manager in Brazil for the National Pharmaceutical Laboratories Association (Alanac) in Brazil.

According to Tada, the revised GMPs on computer validation and product revision are beneficial because they force pharmaceutical companies to comply with quality controls in order to supply the local market with high quality drugs. The changes will also help bring Brazil's pharmaceutical drug manufacture in line with regulatory standards of the most developed countries. (The revised GMP on validating computer systems used in the production of drugs will involve additional costs for companies and as a result, will not be enforceable for three years.)

"By complying with international practices, it is easier for domestically based pharmaceutical companies to [perform] export activities, especially national firms that have been growing steadily," adds Alanac's Tada.

Global harmonization

Other positive changes in the revised GMPs, according to specialists, are related to the global harmonization of procedures and the sharing of relevant information among international regulatory bodies. According to Anvisa, Brazil regularly collaborates with other regulatory and surveillance bodies with regard to information-sharing about inspections.

"Brazil, as a member of the Mercosur trade pact, participates actively in activities ... by sharing data and harmonizing procedures and rules," says Vogler. For example, Anvisa works regularly with the Pan American Network for Drug Regulatory Harmonization (PANDRH). The network was established in 1999 "to support processes on drug regulatory harmonization," according to the US Food and Drug Administration website. Participants in PANDRH include national authorities in the Americas, pharmaceutical interest groups, industry, and academia.

Although the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry does not participate in quality systems and analytical-testing activities as called for by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), notes Tada, Anvisa bases its technical guidelines on those of ICH.

Hellen Berger is a business writer based in São Paulo, Brazil.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
27%
Breakthrough designations
9%
Protecting the supply chain
41%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
9%
More stakeholder involvement
14%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
Sandoz Wins Biosimilar Filing Race
NIH Translational Research Partnership Yields Promising Therapy
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here