Transdermal Delivery of Vaccines and Therapeutic Proteins - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Transdermal Delivery of Vaccines and Therapeutic Proteins
The author reviews advances in technology that may soon allow transdermal delivery of two of the fastest growing drug classes on the pharmaceutical market. This article is part of a special Drug Delivery issue.


Pharmaceutical Technology
pp. s14-s20

References

1. E. N. Marieb and K. Hoehn, Human Anatomy & Physiology, (Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, CA, 8th ed., 2010).

2. J. Nicolas and B. Guy, Expert Reviews Vaccine 7 (8), 1201–1214 (2008).

3. I. M. Braverman, JID Symposium Proceedings 5 (1), 3–9 (2000).

4. A. Laurent et al., Vaccine 25, 6423–6430 (2007).

5. M. Skobe and M. Detmar, JID Symposium Proceedings 5 (1), 14–19 (2000).

6. P. S. Mortimer et al., Jrnl. of Invest. Derm. 95 (6), 677–682 (1990).

7. D. Lubach, W. Ludemann, and D. Berens Von Rautenfeld, Br. J. Dermatol. 135 (5), 733–737 (1996).

8. J. Hickling and R. Jones, WHO PATH, 1–17 (Aug. 27, 2009).

9. G. Rozis et al., Immunology 124, 329–338 (2008).

10. L. Tuft, E.M. Yagle, and S. Rogers, Laboratories of the Graduate Hospital, University of Pennsylvania and the Research Institute of Cutaneous Medicine, pp. 99–110 (Apr. 20, 1931)

11. R. T. Kenney et al., The New Engl. Jrnl. of Med. 351 (22), 2295–2301 (2004).

12. K. J. Hansen and M. A, Tomai, "Highly Efficient Transdermal Delivery of Vaccines," presented at Modern Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems, Vienna, Austria, 2009.

13 S. K. Garg et al., Diabetes Technol. & Therapeut. 11, S5–S16, (2009)

14. S.A. Shoyele, and A. Slowey, Intern. Jrnl. of Pharmaceut. 314, 1–8, (2006)

15. K. Alitalo, T. Tammela, and T. V. Petrova, Nature 438 (15), 946–953 (2005).

16. M. S. Pepper and M. Skobe, Jrnl. of Cell Biol. 163 (2), 209–213 (2003).

17. W. N. Charman, V. J. Stella, Lymphatic Transport of Drugs, (CRS Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, 1992)

18. L. V. Leak, Jrnl. of Cell Biol. 50, 300–323 (1971).

19. L.V. Leak and J. F. Burke, Am. J. Anat. 118, 785–810 (1966).

20. C. J. H. Porter and S. A. Charman, Jrnl. of Pharmaceut. Sci. 89 (3), 297–310 (2000).

21. A. Supersaxo et al., Pharm. Res. 5 (8), 472–476 (1988).

22. W. Morozowich et al., Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rep. Bioact. Mater. 17, 185–186 (1990).

23. S. Mutanishi, T. Fujita, M. Mruakami, and A. Yamamoto, Jrnl. of Contr. Rel. 46, 157–164 (1997).


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
70%
Breakthrough designations
4%
Protecting the supply chain
17%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
2%
More stakeholder involvement
7%
View Results
Eric Langerr Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerRelationship-building at Top of Mind for Clients
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerRisk Reduction Top Driver for Biopharmaceutical Raw Material Development
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Changes and Challenges for Generic Drugs
Faiz Kermaini Industry Insider Faiz KermainiNo Signs of a Slowdown in Mergers
CMOs and the Track-and-Trace Race: Are You Engaged Yet?
Ebola Outbreak Raises Ethical Issues
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 2: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Communications
Better Comms Means a Fitter Future for Pharma, Part 1: Challenges and Changes
Sandoz Wins Biosimilar Filing Race
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here