Development of an Osmotically Controlled Drug-Delivery System of Glipizide - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Development of an Osmotically Controlled Drug-Delivery System of Glipizide
The authors describe the development of an inclusion complex of GLZ and formulated an extended-release dosage form based on osmotic technology.

Pharmaceutical Technology
pp. 80-91

Table III: Statistical comparison of dissolution profile of inclusion complexes.
Dissolution of pure GLZ and all other prepared systems (i.e., complexes and PMs) were carried out in demineralized water. Table III reports the values for the percent of drug dissolved within 20 min (DP 20min ), mean dissolution time (MDT), and time to dissolve 50% of the drug (t 50% ). The data show that the onset of dissolution of pure GLZ is slow (DP 20min value was 6.14%, and t 50% > 2 h).

Figure 6: Drug-release profile of glipizide–HP–β–CD complexes.
Figure 6 shows dissolution profiles of pure GLZ, its PM, and inclusion complexes with HP–β–CD over a period of 120 min. The dissolution rate of pure GLZ is low; 29.69% of the drug is dissolved in 120 min. Inclusion complexes of GLZ with HP–β–CD significantly enhanced the dissolution rate of GLZ within 120 min, compared with PM and pure GLZ. PM with HP–β–CD also improved GLZ's rate of dissolution. The highest improvement was obtained using a complex prepared through coevaporation.

MDT is the first datum for the cumulative dissolution process that provides an accurate drug-release rate. A high MDT value indicates great drug-retarding ability (18). The MDT of pure GLZ was high (99.64 min). This value decreased greatly after the authors prepared GLZ's inclusion complexes and PM with HP–β–CD, which indicated an increase in dissolution rate. Coevaporation 2:1 had the lowest MDT (12.91 min).

Comparisons between the release profiles of different samples of GLZ were made with similarity factor f 2 . Table III shows that the release profiles of GLZ from all samples (i.e., complexes and PMs of HP–β–CD) and from pure GLZ were dissimilar; f 2 values for these comparisons were less than 50. Coevaporation 2:1, which had a better in vitro dissolution profile, lower MDT, and lower f 2 values, was selected for further formulation of as an EOPT.


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
| Weekly

Which of the following business challenge poses the greatest threat to your company?
Building a sustainable pipeline of products
Attracting a skilled workforce
Obtaining/maintaining adequate financing
Regulatory compliance
Building a sustainable pipeline of products
Attracting a skilled workforce
Obtaining/maintaining adequate financing
Regulatory compliance
View Results
Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerBiopharma Outsourcing Activities Update
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia Challener, PhDAppropriate Process Design Critical for Commercial Manufacture of Highly Potent APIs
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler FDA and Manufacturers Seek a More Secure Drug Supply Chain
Sean Milmo European Regulatory WatchSean MilmoQuality by Design?Bridging the Gap between Concept and Implementation
Report: Pfizer Makes $101 Billion Offer to AstraZeneca
Medicare Payment Data Raises Questions About Drug Costs
FDA Wants You!
A New Strategy to Tackle Antibiotic Resistance
Drug-Diagnostic Development Stymied by Payer Concerns
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here