Managing Staff Training And GMP Compliance - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Managing Staff Training And GMP Compliance
A case study is presented that describes how a software control system can ease the complex task of managing training needs across an international company, and improve GMP compliance by ensuring that employees are aptly qualified to perform their assigned tasks.


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 22, Issue 12


Getty/Comstock, WJones
What are the three most important reasons for GMP deviations? A lack of GMP training, a lack of GMP training and a lack of GMP training! The root cause for GMP deviations most frequently listed in inspection reports is the personnel involved in API manufacture and quality assurance.1 GMP training for manufacturing personnel is essential, as defined in Chapter 2 Paragraph 2.9 of the EU GMP Guide and in 211.25 of the FDA cGMP Guide; however, GMP control is not always as good as it should be — as demonstrated by the increasing number of warning letters, import stops and other provisions by regulatory authorities in past years.

Well-qualified employees are an essential part of GMP, and training concepts and the compliance status of personnel are always within the scope of inspections. As such, requirements for qualifications, training and development of all employees involved in GxP relevant operations must be met to ensure that employees can aptly perform their assigned tasks according to their position. The best way to accomplish this is through training programmes tailored to each employee's job. This should not just end with an induction programme, but continue with annual training plans and periodic retraining to ensure that an employee's knowledge and behaviour is maintained at the required level.

Training should be planned, scheduled, conducted and documented using a very systematic approach, particularly in large companies. In 2006, a publication by Schaffer/Schmidt described how a pharmaceutical company established key performance indicators (KPIs) to calculate the ratio between the total number of trainings planned/needed, and the total trainings conducted, which helped management to assess and assign the necessary resources.2 The overall conclusion of this publication was that a companywide training management system is needed to manage the training needs in a pharmaceutical company. The administration of resources, as well as the involvement of the management, is a new requirement defined in ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems.

Planning isn't easy




To plan and monitor GMP training in a pharmaceutical company, a lot of operational information is required. In the past, companies often kept an archive of training certificates or lists of participants signed by each individual, or used spreadsheets, but this approach may not be appropriate for a facility with well over 100 employees. Instead, many large companies are now implementing a software control system to monitor the GMP compliance status and training of their employees. Such a system is more than just a piece of software: it is a general approach to managing the complete process of GMP training, starting with assigning individual training needs to each employee, through to an efficient documentation procedure. The system enables management to easily identify training needs, provides reports regarding the overall training status and also enables the complete tracking of training conducted per employee, which is useful for regulatory requirements.

The following case study describes how a GMP training management system (Pharmschul; Concept Heidelberg, Germany) was introduced at Hoffman La Roche in Basel (Switzerland) to achieve the complex task of managing the GMP training of employees. The software linked with Roche's document management system (DMS) to provide up-to-date information about the status of relevant training documentation.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
33%
Breakthrough designations
17%
Protecting the supply chain
50%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
0%
More stakeholder involvement
0%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
USP Faces New Challenges
Report: Pfizer Makes $101 Billion Offer to AstraZeneca
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here