Real Time Release Testing: Analytical Methods and Innovations - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Real Time Release Testing: Analytical Methods and Innovations
A roundtable moderated by Angie Drakulich.


Pharmaceutical Technology
Volume 35, Issue 2

Technical barriers

PharmTech: What are the key technical barriers to implementing real-time release of a finished drug product overall?

Godec and Yourkin (GE Analytical Instruments): We believe the primarily barriers (not necessarily in order of priority) include the following:

  • The inability of adopters to present a strong business justification to management that can justify the additional expenditures necessary to do final product RTRT. The lack of strong FDA regulatory action on non-RTRT process is probably a major cause of this. The basic business question for companies, therefore, is, Why pay the extra expense of using RTRT if a highly reliable manufacturing process can be established without it? If FDA were to require RTRT, then there would be no business doubt.
  • The analytical tools for RTRT implementation are still being developed.
  • Many pharmaceutical quality systems are still focused on producing pharmaceuticals using detailed standard operating procedures, such as recipes, temperatures, and timings with a three-batch process validation. It is difficult for many quality departments to allow the use of flexible process controls because they require additional subject matter knowledge that is, in many cases, unknown. Quality personnel therefore may perceive that they will have to cede control to the manufacturing department.
  • There is a general lack of direct experience in RTRT projects throughout industry. Only a few pharmaceutical companies have done the required development and research to automate unit operations (processes), which is needed to implement a finished drug product RTRT system.
  • Quite a few pharmaceutical companies are taking small steps in the implementation of automated controls and real-time sensors within their facilities' operations. A good example is the adoption of online total organic carbon (TOC) and online conductivity sensors for pharmaceutical waters. But even in this case, companies generally focus on the high return on investment by decreasing the number of required laboratory samples using information provided by the on-line analyzers. The additional cost of the required quality systems for real-time release of the TOC or conductivity water quality attribute is much more expensive and time consuming than can be justified with the decrease in laboratory samples. There is a new ASTM E55 standard practice, Real-time Release Testing of Pharmaceutical Water for the TOC attribute. This standard may change the number of companies that perform RTRT of their water for the TOC attribute because it addresses the technical issues involved. However, the standard does not address how to make the required quality-system changes.

Vaisman (Malvern Instruments): In-process measurements often produce results that differ slightly from QC laboratory results. Process analytical technology (PAT) equipment may be different from instrumentation used in the laboratory, and materials therefore, may often be characterized in a different state as it flows through the process. Addressing the issue of specification transfer can ease the transition of an analytical technique from development through to commercial manufacture.

In addition, RTRT often demands the successful integration of a number of analytical and manufacturing devices, a process hampered by the lack of collaboration between equipment suppliers and the existence of few applicable standards. The relatively new OPC Foundation's Analytical Device Integration (ADI) standard will help in this area but there is still work to be done.

Redman (Mettler-Toledo AutoChem): The key technical barrier I see is the integration of measurement technology with appropriate process modeling and control algorithms for holistic model-based control of the critical quality attributes (CQAS) through direct manipulation of the critical process parameters (CPPs). There is certainly room for improvement in existing measurement technologies to directly monitor CQAS and greatly enhance RTRT capabilities. However, with sufficiently reliable control of the CPPs, RTRT does not have to rely on relocating the quality assurance/quality control laboratory for in-line and at-line analysis. With true QbD, the burden of testing can theoretically be reduced to a minimal level by ensuring product quality through monitoring and control of the process itself.

Farquharson (Real-Time Analyzers): The technical barriers associated with RTRT are tied to the PAT tools being used. In addition to material property tools, spectroscopy tools, specifically Raman, NIR, and infrared analyzers, are being used to monitor the synthesis of a drug or determine the composition of a pill. Each has advantages and limitations.

For example, Raman and NIR can be interfaced into reactors via highly transmitting fiber optics, IR cannot; Raman and IR provide exceptional specificity (e.g., distinguishing polymorphs), NIR less so; NIR and IR can measure trace quantities of chemicals while Raman is typically limited to 0.1% chemical concentrations. In all cases, the variability of the measurement must be much smaller than the variability of the process. The former depends on the dynamic range and precision of the measurement (e.g., a spectral peak used to determine concentration that changes intensity significantly is better than an unresolved peak that changes very little). It also depends on the stability of the analyzer. For this reason, interferometers have dominated chemical plant installations. A shift in the x-axis, a potential problem with dispersive Raman analyzers, can result in incorrect analysis and decision making.

The key limitation for these technologies is measurements that do not correctly represent the process or product, such as the contents of a reactor or the composition of a pill.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
FDASIA was signed into law two years ago. Where has the most progress been made in implementation?
Reducing drug shortages
Breakthrough designations
Protecting the supply chain
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
More stakeholder involvement
Reducing drug shortages
32%
Breakthrough designations
8%
Protecting the supply chain
40%
Expedited reviews of drug submissions
8%
More stakeholder involvement
12%
View Results
Jim Miller Outsourcing Outlook Jim Miller Health Systems Raise the Bar on Reimbursing New Drugs
Cynthia Challener, PhD Ingredients Insider Cynthia ChallenerThe Mainstreaming of Continuous Flow API Synthesis
Jill Wechsler Regulatory Watch Jill Wechsler Industry Seeks Clearer Standards for Track and Trace
Siegfried Schmitt Ask the Expert Siegfried SchmittData Integrity
Sandoz Wins Biosimilar Filing Race
NIH Translational Research Partnership Yields Promising Therapy
Clusters set to benefit from improved funding climate but IP rights are even more critical
Supplier Audit Program Marks Progress
FDA, Drug Companies Struggle with Compassionate Use Requests
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here