Tabletting: Expert Views - Pharmaceutical Technology

Latest Issue
PharmTech

Latest Issue
PharmTech Europe

Tabletting: Expert Views
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe brings together suppliers of tabletting equipment and excipients to discuss the challenges, innovations and latest trends in the tabletting industry.


Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
Volume 4, Issue 23

Q. What are the main challenges facing tabletting manufacturers?

Prideaux: In anticipation of future patent losses, we are seeing tablet manufacturers trying to boost the productivity of their blockbusters to ensure a robust supply chain as a counter to new generic entrants. The challenge here is to increase capacity and reduce costs, without a massive investment. There are a number of solutions on the market that can help achieve this, including multi-tip tooling, die segment turrets and coatings; all of which can facilitate the speed or output of an existing tablet press. Paying greater attention to the fine detail of tooling design and the effective maintenance of both the tooling and press can also help reduce tablet press down time and increase productivity.

Globalisation and the relocation of products to alternative plants worldwide can also create problems. For instance, subtle changes in environmental conditions and material supply can hinder process replication at a new site, and there is also the challenge of training new operatives. The knowledge and support of key suppliers with global experience can be vital in supporting this process, and the speed and effectiveness of the supplier's response can be critical.

Finally, the pharma industry must juggle the margin loss from the former blockbusters with the need to invest in new drug development. The net result of this is increased pressure to reduce cost and increase efficiency in all manufacturing operations.

Natoli: One of the major challenges for the tabletting industry is the competition that is now coming from developing, low-labour index countries. However, competition also has its benefits because it encourages innovation and process improvements. The need for reduced costs and manufacturing times has also led a number of manufacturers to use direct compression, which offers reduced costs and processing times. However, caution is required because some blends using this method result in unfavourable powders that are not suitable for tabletting.

Looking more in-depth at the tabletting manufacturing process, there are a number of common challenges that must be faced such as capping, sticking and tool binding. To overcome these issues, many tablet manufacturers have their punch or die configurations modified to be better suited for the product being compressed. This isn't a new trend as such, but is becoming more prevalent as tablet manufacturers attempt to reduce costs by minimising powder processing.

Chesnoy: The manufacturing processes for tablets can be divided into three techniques: wet granulation, dry granulation and direct compression.

With wet and dry granulation techniques, the challenges relate to the complexity of the many steps involved in obtaining a powder blend exhibiting required flowability and compressibility parameters. For the simpler process of direct compression, the main challenges are to guarantee excipient properties and control any variables.

According to a survey conducted in 2010, poor formulation design accounts for 34% of common problems encountered during tablet manufacturing, while problems in blend uniformity account for 15%.1 This means that around 50% of the problems encountered by tabletting manufacturers could be solved by adjusting the mechanical properties of powders, such as flowability, dilution potential and compressibility.

The remaining problems are linked to tabletting equipment. As the excipient's performances should be tested on different tablet presses, the development of a tablet press simulator could help gain a better understanding of the physical behaviour of excipients, and blends thereof, under compression. Conventional presses equipped with data acquisition systems could also provide information on compression cycles, ejection force and heckle plot analysis.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters

Subscribe: Click to learn more about the newsletter
| Weekly
| Monthly
|Monthly
| Weekly

Survey
How does your company apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles to manufacturing processes?
To all processes for both new and legacy products
To all process for new products only
To select process for new products only
To select processes for both new and legacy products
Do not use QbD
To all processes for both new and legacy products
18%
To all process for new products only
13%
To select process for new products only
22%
To select processes for both new and legacy products
22%
Do not use QbD
24%
View Results
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA
July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA
August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA
August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

Eric Langer Outsourcing Outlook Eric LangerOutsourcing's Modest Role as a Cost-Containment Strategy
Patricia Van Arnum Ingredients Insider Patricia Van ArnumIntellectual Property Battles in Solid-State Chemistry
Nathan Jessop Industry Insider Nathan Jessop Campaign Against Counterfeit Drugs Continues
Lynn Torbeck Statistical Solutions Lynn D. TorbeckCompositing Samples and the Risk to Product Quality
 More
Inadequate Access to Medicines Puts EU at Risk
FDA Offers Insight on QbD for Modified-Release Products
Global Biosimilars Market to Reach $2.445 Billion in 2013
Adapting to Change
AstraZeneca and Exco InTouch Collaborate to Augment Current COPD Pathways
FindPharma Custom Search
Source: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe,
Click here